[PHP] Re: Frameworks / obstinate?

2009-03-22 Thread Shawn McKenzie
Daniel Kolbo wrote: > Tony Marston wrote: >> "Nitsan Bin-Nun" wrote in message >> news:d47da0100903220910q7bb66706s6255f0fc89b98...@mail.gmail.com... >> >>> Don't forget to attach the message to the list. >>> >>> Regarding the frameworks, which of them, for your opinion, will take the >>> fastes

[PHP] Re: Frameworks Which Have A "Bake" Function?

2009-03-22 Thread Tony Marston
"Nitsan Bin-Nun" wrote in message news:d47da0100903220852v565771e5r9a3a72184a0a...@mail.gmail.com... > Hi Guys, > > I have been using cakephp for a while as a development framework. > > I'm also thinking for a while to use another framework and leave cakephp > alone (too much babbling.. it takes

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-31 Thread Shawn McKenzie
Eric Butera wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > >> Eric Butera wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote: >>> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > From what I could tell, this was

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-31 Thread Eric Butera
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Eric Butera wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: >>> >>> Eric Butera wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > > Eric Butera wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 20

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-31 Thread Nathan Rixham
Eric Butera wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: Eric Butera wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: Eric Butera wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote: From wha

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-31 Thread Eric Butera
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Eric Butera wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Shawn McKenzie >> wrote: >>> >>> Eric Butera wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wr

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-31 Thread Nathan Rixham
Eric Butera wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: Eric Butera wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote: From what I could tell, this was the best RAD, however if you prefer to lay everythi

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-31 Thread Eric Butera
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > Eric Butera wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote: >>> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote: From what I could tell, this was the best RAD, however if you prefer to lay everything out

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-31 Thread Shawn McKenzie
Eric Butera wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >>> From what I could tell, this was >>> the best RAD, however if you prefer to lay everything out your own way >>> and do things your own way then probably CI o

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-30 Thread Eric Butera
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >> From what I could tell, this was >> the best RAD, however if you prefer to lay everything out your own way >> and do things your own way then probably CI or Zend. > > I use Zend ev

Re: [PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-30 Thread Kevin Waterson
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:03 -0600, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > From what I could tell, this was > the best RAD, however if you prefer to lay everything out your own way > and do things your own way then probably CI or Zend. I use Zend every day in my current employ. It is like pulling teeth and its f

[PHP] Re: frameworks

2009-01-30 Thread Shawn McKenzie
Frank Stanovcak wrote: > Ok. I've done some reading on frameworks for PHP now, and have this > question. > > What are some good resources for learning about the various frameworks > available, and do you recomend one over another? If so why? > > I started using PHP before frameworks came into

Re: [PHP] Re: Frameworks

2006-11-07 Thread Tony Marston
Radicore is built using PHP, so if PHP can run under IIS then so can Radicore. If you already have a working PHP installation running under IIS then Radicore should work. I'm not sure about the .htaccess settings though, so you will have to consult the IIS manual. Tony Marston http://www.tonym

Re: [PHP] Re: Frameworks

2006-11-05 Thread John . H
I have just watched the Code Igniter Video Tutorials and found thtat it is very easy to make a MVC module by using this framework,and it is very similar to the CMS I just developed.Also I still pay attention to other framework,and I hope to find a framework that can be really helpful to my work,bu

[PHP] Re: Frameworks

2006-11-05 Thread Bruce Cowin
Hi Tony, On the installation instructions for Radicore, I see a lot of mention of Apache but no mention of IIS set up. Does Radicore work on IIS? Thanks. Regards, Bruce >>> "Tony Marston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/11/2006 11:10:12 p.m. >>> It totally depends on what type of application you are

[PHP] Re: Frameworks

2006-11-03 Thread Tony Marston
It totally depends on what type of application you are writing, and what features you want "out of the box" so that you don't have to design and write them yourself. For example, if you are writing an administrative web application and you want user authentication, dynamic menus, role based acc

[PHP] Re: Frameworks

2006-11-02 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, on 11/02/2006 05:37 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following: > I know this subject has been covered in the past, but my question is why > use them? I'm hoping to not create a religious war... I see that > frameworks would probably help you develop some things faster, but most > of the tim