On 7/8/10, Nisse Engström wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:15:02 +0200, "Gary ." wrote:
>> I'm guessing that those attributes "must" be quoted in XML and
>> "should" be in HTML (but patently aren't)?
>
> For that attribute value, it's a "must" in both cases.
Okay. Please tell L**! :)
--
PHP Ge
On 7/8/10, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 8 July 2010 16:15, Gary wrote:
>> Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
>> be that the body tag looks like
>>
>> and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
>> claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:15:02 +0200, "Gary ." wrote:
> Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
> be that the body tag looks like
>
> and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
> claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
>
> I'm guessing that
On 8 July 2010 16:15, Gary . wrote:
> Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
> be that the body tag looks like
>
> and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
> claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
>
> I'm guessing that those attributes
Okay. At least one of the problems with this so called HTML seems to
be that the body tag looks like
and xml_parse complains that "> required" on that line (i.e. it is
claiming it can't find the end of the tag!).
I'm guessing that those attributes "must" be quoted in XML and
"should" be in HTML (
5 matches
Mail list logo
