On Jan 8, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings
wrote:
...
They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
Tacos?
Bastien
Sent from my iPod
--
PHP General Mailing List (http:
Sorry forgot to mention that we used APC with apc.stat turned off
which will give a little bit more performance gain, but it does mean
flushing the cache on every code push (which is trivial).
Ravi
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, J Ravi Menon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A note on bytecode caching and inc
Hi,
A note on bytecode caching and include/include_once performance. A
while ago when we were profiling our code, we did notice that file
includes do take a noticeable percentage of overall overhead (enough
for us to look into it more deep). We are using apc cache on a
standard LAMP platform (linu
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
http://itst.ne
Graham Cossey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
:)
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Frame
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> ...
> They almost always make your shit run faster.
You know they make medicine for that? ;-)
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> They almost always make your shit run faster.
I love your final statement Robert!
A reply of good grammar and vocabulary summarised most succinctly.
--
Graham
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:48:59 -0500, rob...@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings)
wrote:
>clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
>> Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches.
>> They're an
>> interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
>> http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-th
clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. I did not know about bytecode caches. They're
an
interesting concept, but if I am interpreting the paper
http://itst.net/654-php-on-fire-three-opcode-caches-compared correctly they
only double
the average speed of operation, which is
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:20:26 -0500, kolb0...@umn.edu (Daniel Kolbo) wrote:
>Daevid Vincent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>>> To: p
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:11:07 -0800, dae...@daevid.com ("Daevid Vincent") wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 04:11, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I think it's a case by case basis. Generally File I/O is expensive, but
> then again, as you say, having everything in a couple files is also
> sub-optimal for organizing and keeping things modular.
That is easily sorted out using automated bu
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Daevid Vincent wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
include files, or a few big ones?
On 1/6/2010
Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
>> include fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:09 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP programming strategy; lots of little
> include files, or a few big ones?
>
>
>
&
On 1/6/2010 7:18 PM, clanc...@cybec.com.au wrote:
I have a flexible program, which can do many different things according to the
type of
data it is fed. Ideally the flexibility is achieved by calling different
functions,
though when the functionality is ill-defined I sometimes just include b
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 1:05 PM +0100 8/9/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 07:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
>>
>> > But, as it was said, IE's have problems with first-child rules.
>>>
>>
>> How does IE8 fare with selectors in CSS?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ash
>
> ted
At 1:05 PM +0100 8/9/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 07:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
> But, as it was said, IE's have problems with first-child rules.
How does IE8 fare with selectors in CSS?
Thanks,
Ash
tedd = clue--
or
tedd < clue
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 07:55 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 10:54 AM +1000 8/9/09, Clancy wrote:
> >On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:53:42 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote:
> > >Also, if you use first-child, it could be taken down to:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yanni Nx
> >> Sally Riordan Sc
At 10:54 AM +1000 8/9/09, Clancy wrote:
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:53:42 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote:
>Also, if you use first-child, it could be taken down to:
Yanni Nx
Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
Except that line 2 is smaller than line 1. In my sche
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:53:42 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote:
>You don't need the width="210" height="300". For example, this works:
>
>
>
> Yanni Nx
> Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
>
I have read that if you omit the dimensions you will sometimes see the page
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 07:53 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 6:32 AM +0100 8/7/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >
> > >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Yanni Nx
> >>Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> (And the t
At 6:32 AM +0100 8/7/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
Yanni Nx
Sally Riordan Scholarship, 2007-
(And the thing that really astounds me about CSS is that they
never thought of putting in
constants. Instead o
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:32:48 +0100, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley Sheridan)
wrote:
...
>> How, for example, could I otherwise achieved the following effect, which
>> displays an image
>> with a border slightly darker than the background, and with the title and
>> subtitle inside
>> the b
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:06 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:28:32 +0100, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley
> Sheridan) wrote:
>
> ...
> >> >> Nested tables are the devils playthings!
> >>
> >> I must be the devil, then. I enjoy playing with them. And if they're
> >> done rig
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:28:32 +0100, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk (Ashley Sheridan)
wrote:
...
>> >> Nested tables are the devils playthings!
>>
>> I must be the devil, then. I enjoy playing with them. And if they're done
>> right they
>> seem to work on every system I have tried them on. Gr
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:05 +0200, Ralph Deffke wrote:
> as it comes to this point I can recomment an O'reilly book "High Performance
> Web Sites, essential knowledge for frontend engineers"
>
> if u read that book ur eyes will grow and u will not bother about php
> comments,
>
> ralph
>
>
> "A
as it comes to this point I can recomment an O'reilly book "High Performance
Web Sites, essential knowledge for frontend engineers"
if u read that book ur eyes will grow and u will not bother about php
comments,
ralph
"Ashley Sheridan" wrote in message
news:1249543712.3358.104.ca...@localhost.
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:24 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:25:20 -0400, phps...@gmail.com (Bastien Koert) wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> >wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> >>> Thank you to all of you who have commented on t
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:25:20 -0400, phps...@gmail.com (Bastien Koert) wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
>wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
>>> Thank you to all of you who have commented on this query.
>>>
>>> On the subject of comments, I feel that La
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
>> Thank you to all of you who have commented on this query.
>>
>> On the subject of comments, I feel that Larry Garfield settled this query by
>> pointing out
>> that halving the size of a p
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:49 +1000, Clancy wrote:
> Thank you to all of you who have commented on this query.
>
> On the subject of comments, I feel that Larry Garfield settled this query by
> pointing out
> that halving the size of a particular document gave a barely noticeable
> increase in sp
Thank you to all of you who have commented on this query.
On the subject of comments, I feel that Larry Garfield settled this query by
pointing out
that halving the size of a particular document gave a barely noticeable
increase in speed.
Paul Foster pointed out the problem of maintenance, but
Ollisso wrote:
4. If you have huge load, then it is much more efficient (and easier) to
use other methods. For Example: install APC (http://fi2.php.net/apc )
It will cache all requests to your files and this will have huge impact
on your performance. Much more than you can achieve by strippin
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:25:40 +0300, Clancy wrote:
Is anyone here interested in discussing programming strategy, or or know
of a discussion
group which is interested in the subject?
The sorts of questions I am interested in are:
1. I have a highly variable program which always shows the same
35 matches
Mail list logo
