On Tue, January 15, 2008 11:03 pm, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 01/16/2008 02:11 AM mike said the following:
>> Why not look at phpmailer? Probably more robust than some random
>> classes.
>
> I did not suggest any random classes. I developed those classes since
> 1999 and I know they work
mike said the following on 2008-1-16 12:11:
> Why not look at phpmailer? Probably more robust than some random classes.
>
> http://phpmailer.codeworxtech.com/
>
Thanks Mike. I will try both and tell you guys I like which one.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, vi
On 1/15/08, Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are missing my point. One thing is disliking somebody's work for
> whatever reasons, another this is acting disrespectfully and call it
> crappy in a public forum. If you don't know how to act respectfully with
> other PHP developers, I have
Hello,
on 01/16/2008 03:25 AM mike said the following:
> This list is democratic as well. Personal experience has led me there
> from many Google queries, and none of the code has been usable.
That does not give you the right to generalize and call all the code in
the site crappy, including the t
Manuel Lemos said the following on 2008-1-16 13:14:
>> But it's strange that php should send a "DATA" command out, but tcpdump
>> didn't
>> capture this packet. :(
>
> I don't know why you are using tcpdump, but maybe you are only capturing
> a network interface that is not the one that your code
Hello,
on 01/16/2008 02:11 AM mike said the following:
> Why not look at phpmailer? Probably more robust than some random classes.
I did not suggest any random classes. I developed those classes since
1999 and I know they work reliably because they are used by me and tens
of thousands of users th
> -Original Message-
> From: mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 1:11 AM
> To: Wang Chen
> Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: [QUESTION] MAIL: Send a NOOP instead of DATA
>
> Why not look at phpmailer? Probab
This list is democratic as well. Personal experience has led me there
from many Google queries, and none of the code has been usable.
I give you props for creating a site and classes on it and such, but
this list is for people to ask and share opinions. I said it was not
to badmouth you but my per
Hello,
on 01/16/2008 02:11 AM mike said the following:
> Why not look at phpmailer? Probably more robust than some random classes.
I did not suggest any random classes. I developed those classes since
1999 and I know they work reliably because they are used by me and tens
of thousands of users th
Hello,
on 01/16/2008 02:00 AM Wang Chen said the following:
>> Maybe you are accessing a SMTP server with a grey listing or
>> anti-spam/anti-virus frontend that sits on the front of the actual SMTP
>> server and only passes information to the backend server when it is ready.
>>
>> It is possible
Why not look at phpmailer? Probably more robust than some random classes.
http://phpmailer.codeworxtech.com/
Not to bash on Manuel, but I find phpclasses to be littered with lots
of crappy code and is too ad-laden and hard to use for me to bother.
On 1/15/08, Wang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Manuel Lemos said the following on 2008-1-16 11:55:
> Maybe you are accessing a SMTP server with a grey listing or
> anti-spam/anti-virus frontend that sits on the front of the actual SMTP
> server and only passes information to the backend server when it is ready.
>
> It is possible that your mes
Hello,
on 01/16/2008 01:38 AM Wang Chen said the following:
> I wrote a class to send mail by remote mail server.
> But it was failed. So I captured the network packets by tcpdump,
> and found that there is a strange packet "NOOP" was sent.
> But in the source code I mean to send command "DATA".
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
