On Friday, June 14, 2002, 11:07:24 AM, Brian McGarvie wrote:
> Basically then there is no real reason for Apache over IIS on win2k server?
Not now Apache 2 is here. Apache 1.x has always been considered by the Apache
group as beta code and therefore not suitable for use in a production
environmen
Basically then there is no real reason for Apache over IIS on win2k server?
I am the admin of the Webservers, but the overall network manager would like to keep
it MS-centric just because all the rest is.
With our leased line we aqquired 16 ips, so in the IIS config I would just use that IP
an
On Friday, June 14, 2002, 9:13:59 AM, Brian McGarvie wrote:
> How does IIS fair against Apache with servring multiple sites? each site will be
>like... http://customername.ourdomain.co.uk
Both are capable of serving multiple sites without any issues that I am aware
of.
> Also - more an IIS/Apac
3 matches
Mail list logo
