On Thursday 15 July 2004 16:02, Ed Lazor wrote:
> There are
> some benefits to having the cgi available though. For example, if you're
> at a unix prompt and need to process a file. Or, more commonly, if you
> want to execute scripts in cronjobs.
For these situations you would be better off usi
> -Original Message-
> When you say cgi vs. php, I'm going to assume you mean cgi versus apache
> module (correct me if I misunderstand). To be honest I don't know
> enough about the internals of the apache module to tell you why it's
> better for an apache server (would love it if someone
Bruce, you need to start new threads when you ask a new question... a
lot of people don't bother to check out a thread that's already got
responses, and it really makes more logical sense to start a new one
anyway (original post is below my response)...
When you say cgi vs. php, I'm going to as
3 matches
Mail list logo
