Addressed to: Miguel Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Reply to note from Miguel Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:11:46 -0500 (CDT)
>
> I'm guessing the issue is that it complicates the process of adding new
> images, because someone has to create and upload
I'm guessing the issue is that it complicates the process of adding new
images, because someone has to create and upload two corresponding files.
This way, they get the benefit of rapid page generation combined with a
simpler administration process.
miguel
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED
I think he already has the best solution. Store two images. How many
thumbnails are there on a page? At 1-2 seconds per image to resize how
long will you make every visitor wait to see the thumbnails?
Disk space is cheap. If you have to buy another drive - no big deal. I
don't know about yo
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Ray Paseur 703.346.0600 wrote:
> I am storing several detailed images at about 400x400 pixels (inventory
> for an art gallery). I show a page with thumbnails of the images. When
> a site visitor clicks on a thumbnail, I open a separate window to
> display the detailed image.
This is off-topic, but someone in the group may have a good idea, so
I'll ask it here. Please also reply to my email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
thanks.
I am storing several detailed images at about 400x400 pixels (inventory
for an art gallery). I show a page with thumbnails of the images. When
a s
5 matches
Mail list logo
