On Thu, October 27, 2005 9:56 pm, Chris wrote:
> Though I suppose you could make an argument for using expressions that
> consist of only constant values.
Actually...
One could argue that so long as the programmer was willing to accept
the consequences, there could be many legitimate circumstance
Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:02 +0200, Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
[snip]
and it works fine, I cannot define a constant by expression, like:
class Foo {
const AAA = 1 << 0;
const BBB = 1 << 1;
const CCC = 1 <
Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:02 +0200, Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
[snip]
and it works fine, I cannot define a constant by expression, like:
class Foo {
const AAA = 1 << 0;
const BBB = 1 << 1;
const CCC = 1 << 2;
const DDD = 1 << 3;
}
Well now,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 01:02 +0200, Dragan Stanojevic - Nevidljivi wrote:
[snip]
> and it works fine, I cannot define a constant by expression, like:
>
> class Foo {
> const AAA = 1 << 0;
> const BBB = 1 << 1;
> const CCC = 1 << 2;
> const DDD =1 << 3;
> }
>
> Well now, is this a b
Hi guys,
I think I've found a bug. I have a bunch of constants, and I'd like to
present them as flags. While I can do
class Foo {
const AAA = 1;
const BBB = 2;
const CCC = 4;
const DDD = 8;
}
and it works fine, I cannot define a constant by expression, like:
class Foo {
const
This code:
results in this error:
PHP Fatal error: Unsupported operand types in /test.php on line 13
Shouldn't class constants support simple expressions ?
Cristiano Duarte
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
6 matches
Mail list logo
