>That's a really interesting link. Thanks!
No problem, my pleasure
I was quite shocked to see how PHP performed
gcc still rocks though
Brent
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Got a lot of good replies, and info!
Thanks,
JP
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/index2.shtml
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/bench/ary3/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Richard Davey wrote:
Hello John,
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 2:37:30 PM, you wrote:
JN> Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
You meant satanist, surely? ;)
(or a masochist!)
Ah, yes. My apologies, you're right. Evil has to stick together. An
Atheist wouldn't use anything sinc
Hello John,
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 2:37:30 PM, you wrote:
JN> Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
You meant satanist, surely? ;)
(or a masochist!)
--
Best regards,
Richard Davey
http://www.phpcommunity.org/wiki/296.html
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/
> Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
> [/snip]
>
> And if so, what must a Buddhist use?
Lisp, of course.
-
michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/cahttp://mike.teczno.com/contact.html
--
PH
[snip]
Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
[/snip]
And if so, what must a Buddhist use?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
John Nichel wrote:
John W. Holmes wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Depends if you catholic or not.
Use what you know.
---John Holmes...
Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
oh d..n i hate ASP.
--
Raditha Dissana
John W. Holmes wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Depends if you catholic or not.
Use what you know.
---John Holmes...
Uh-oh, does that mean an Atheist has to use ASP??? ;)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Thanks,
JP
Well, Perl is older and has four letters in it's name. PHP has youth on
it's side. Perl is a Camel and PHP is a bird (Thrush or Roadrunner...I
don't know my birds). Perl is misspelled more often than PHP
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Depends if you catholic or not.
Use what you know.
---John Holmes...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
This is a religious question.
Thanks,
JP
--
Raditha Dissanayake.
-
http://www.radinks.com/print/upload.php
SFTP, FTP and HTTP File Upload solutions
--
PHP General
[snip]
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
[/snip]
That is like asking what would be the technical arguements of an 10"
miter saw and a 12" miter saw. Both are tools, each is better suited to
some things and not as well suited for others. In some projects we have
several differe
What would be the technical arguments of PHP vs. PERL?
Thanks,
JP
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Paul Chvostek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
>
> I have to write a swath of code to manage system-related stuff based on
> database content. Scripts will be run as root by cron, and determine
> what they have to do via user interaction and SQL lookups. Functions
> will include manipulation of
I'm more comfortable writing stuff in PHP. I use PHP alot more, and I
find the resultant code more readable and easier to maintain. Aside
from Perl's ubiquity and the dubious advantage of future flexibility by
using Perl's DBI interface to talk to different SQL servers (I'm using
MySQL at the m
I have to write a swath of code to manage system-related stuff based on
database content. Scripts will be run as root by cron, and determine
what they have to do via user interaction and SQL lookups. Functions
will include manipulation of system configuration files, legacy text
file configs, and
Everyone,
I was wondering if there are any perl/php programmers that have used mason.
I am trying to get the advantages/disadvantages of each?
I am pro PHP, but my does is pro perl. What does everyone think about the
benefits of one over the other?
Thanks,
Ray
signature.asc
Description: Th
[PHP] PHP vs. PERL (Functional Comparison)??
> > ie. don't necessarily use 1 file per block, create functions that are
> > defined in a single file and call those instead of including a new file.
>
> How do you echo your html, do you put the html in your functions and
>
> > ie. don't necessarily use 1 file per block, create functions that are
> > defined in a single file and call those instead of including a new file.
>
> How do you echo your html, do you put the html in your functions and
> escape the double quotes? There is some extra load there echoing all the
> ie. don't necessarily use 1 file per block, create functions that are
> defined in a single file and call those instead of including a new file.
How do you echo your html, do you put the html in your functions and
escape the double quotes? There is some extra load there echoing all the
html?
T
> I mean, for example say you have
> an html that consists of blocks... Making every block
> an include is clean, but this time, php engine has to
> read all of these includes, and parse the html+php and
> compile/run php everytime a request is made??? I am
> not sure about this?
I wouldn't say i
> ??? I didn't get this? Aren't these pre-forked
> processes handle requests using threads internally?
> Say you configure apache to pre-fork 5 server
> processes, what you are saying implies that you can
> only handle 5 concurrent requests?? can you please
> explain this more?
That's exactly
> Threading instead of forking? None of these do
> either. Apache is a
> pre-forking multi-process server and both PHP and
> mod_perl are part of
> these pre-forked processes. Neither mod_perl nor
> PHP do any threading nor forking.
??? I didn't get this? Aren't these pre-forked
processes han
> Why on earth would you prefer java servlets?
Hmm... Let's see;Java is a full-fledge, totally OOP
and awesome programming language but not a scripting
language. Speed (will be mentioning this later),
having total control over whatever you want (exception
handling, db pooling, caching, syncrh
> 1.Speed: If you use mod_perl or fastcgi kind of deals
> (which are based on threadding instead of forking), I
> don't think PHP is considerably faster than perl? Is
> that the case?
Threading instead of forking? None of these do either. Apache is a
pre-forking multi-process server and both PH
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Bora Paksoy wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I am planning to implement a new site which will be
> using mysql db heavily, and I am in the middle of (and
> stuck:) deciding what I should use for implementation.
> I would definitely prefer Java Servlets, but it is
> very expensive to host ser
Hi;
I am planning to implement a new site which will be
using mysql db heavily, and I am in the middle of (and
stuck:) deciding what I should use for implementation.
I would definitely prefer Java Servlets, but it is
very expensive to host servlets, so I am only
comparing PHP vs. Perl.
I have b
> I'm pretty new to programming - besides JavaScript, PHP is really the
first
> language I've used.
> I'm just wondering, and I'm sure you all would know - should I learn
Perl?
> Is it considered a necessity for a web developer to know Perl, or is
it not
> a worthwhile endeavor, considering how ea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd go for it. Perl can be messy, but it is also quite powerful and
doesn't HAVE to be messy. It is EVERYWHERE both in terms of availability
and use. But most of all, it is a fun language to play with... and if you
do any system admin it is an indispe
7;Reilly's
Learning Perl, http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/lperl3/
-Original Message-
From: Tom Malone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:03 PM
To: PHP Users
Subject: [PHP] PHP vs Perl question
I'm pretty new to programming - besides JavaScript, PHP is reall
I do love perl, even if I mostly code with PHP, but I use perl for
stuff that run with a crontab (a script that run on every x date or
hours), I know that you can do that with PHP now too, but Perl is a
really great and funny language to learn, the best regular expression
that I ever use (I still
I'm pretty new to programming - besides JavaScript, PHP is really the first
language I've used.
I'm just wondering, and I'm sure you all would know - should I learn Perl?
Is it considered a necessity for a web developer to know Perl, or is it not
a worthwhile endeavor, considering how easy PHP is
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] PHP vs Perl security
Hi. Are there any known/posssible security issues with PHP using SSL?
I'm trying to figure out if it would be better to user Perl or PHP based
on their security features/flaws. I'm sure there's holes in both, but
which one has
Hi. Are there any known/posssible security issues with PHP using SSL?
I'm trying to figure out if it would be better to user Perl or PHP based
on their security features/flaws. I'm sure there's holes in both, but
which one has the bigger hole...?
Thanks,
Jeff
--
PHP General Mailing List (htt
someone recently posted a link to a benchmark test that was
done...there's never an absolute, but i do remember php w/zend as pretty
much whipping the competition...search the mailing list for the link if
you want to see for yourself...
-jack
David Hynes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to PHP (well
David Hynes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to PHP (well I used it years ago), and have been using Perl ever
> since.
>
> Someone told me that PHP is a lot more efficient than Perl, is this true ? I
> am developing a fairly large website using a MySQL database running on a
> cobalt RAQ3 server and so
Hi,
I'm new to PHP (well I used it years ago), and have been using Perl ever
since.
Someone told me that PHP is a lot more efficient than Perl, is this true ? I
am developing a fairly large website using a MySQL database running on a
cobalt RAQ3 server and so the speed of the scripts must be kep
> When Jason says 'especially when your note using the cgi' he means the
> cgi version of PHP (I think) in preference to installing PHP as an
> apache module.
Almost, yes - I literally meant the 'common gateway interface', due to the
fact that the webserver spawns the requested script/program ou
On Thursday 15 February 2001 08:03, Scott Mebberson wrote:
> When Jason says 'especially when your note using the cgi' he means the
> cgi version of PHP (I think) in preference to installing PHP as an
> apache module.
...just as using mod_perl is better than perl as CGI
--
Christian Reiniger
LG
When Jason says 'especially when your note using the cgi' he means the cgi
version of PHP (I think) in preference to installing PHP as an apache
module.
""Jason Brooke"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
04ad01c0970f$927eeff0$0100a8c0@jb">news:04ad01c0970f$927eeff0$0100a8c0@jb...
> > Is there
> Is there any reason why php is better than perl for shopping carts
> and/or product catalogs?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
It's hard to just come out and say that php is better than perl for shopping
carts because there's too many factors to take into consideration.
If you were a person who'd never use
Is there any reason why php is better than perl for shopping carts
and/or product catalogs?
Thanks,
Jeff
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [E
43 matches
Mail list logo
