On Saturday 09 August 2003 00:54, Dan Phiffer wrote:
> Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere that
> lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
google > php bugs
--
Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems Integrators
* Web D
On Friday 08 August 2003 09:43, Justin French wrote:
> i think the best reason to keep up-to-date on the versions is that each
> new release is "better, more stable, etc etc"... i haven't ever heard
> anyone on this list say "i prefer 4.2.3 over 4.2.4" :)
But each new release brings new problems
On Saturday 09 August 2003 01:46, Dan Phiffer wrote:
> I appreciate the (rather indirect) pointer to the PHP bug tracking site - I
> didn't know about that. Errata, it seems to me anyway, perform a different
> purpose. I don't mind RTFM-style responses, but please at least read my
> question more c
On 08 August 2003 19:00, Jason Wong wrote:
> Whereas changelog, history, release notes will summarise what bugs
> were fixed between versions. None of these resources are called
> errata although some linux distros may present these as erratum
> (plural?).
Well, since you ask, erratum is the sin
From: "Justin French" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dan Phiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Old version of PHP
> On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 09:21 AM, Dan Phiffer wrote:
>
> >
actually u can explicitly turn on registered globals with a setting in
a .htaccess file
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Neil Davis wrote:
Fellas,
can't see how this should be an issue.
It is a security issue. Most ISP's don't allow register_globals to be
turned
on. Read the php docs about register_globals. Zeev and company explain
it
better than I can.
http://www.php.net/r
t 08, 2003 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Old version of PHP
> On Saturday 09 August 2003 00:54, Dan Phiffer wrote:
> > Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere
that
> > lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
>
> google > php bugs
>
> -
> > > Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere
> > > lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
> >
> > google > php bugs
>
> I appreciate the (rather indirect) pointer to the PHP bug tracking site - I
> didn't know about that. Errata, it seems to me anyway, perform a dif
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 09:21 AM, Dan Phiffer wrote:
I'm working on an ongoing project that depends on a shared webserver
running
an old version of PHP (4.1.2 I believe). Is there any good reason to
stick
with an older version of PHP, or might it be a valid suggestion to
have it
upgraded
Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Is there an errata page somewhere that
lists known bugs in the PHP interpretter?
Thanks,
-Dan
"Jason Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Friday 08 August 2003 09:43, Justin French wrote:
>
> > i think the best reason to keep up
* Thus wrote Ford, Mike [LSS] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (There are also words in English derived from Greek which have singular ending -on
> and plural ending -a -- notably criterion/criteria. Microsoft doesn't understand
> this, and gets it tooth-jarringly wrong all over Excel and
Hello,
I'm working on an ongoing project that depends on a shared webserver running
an old version of PHP (4.1.2 I believe). Is there any good reason to stick
with an older version of PHP, or might it be a valid suggestion to have it
upgraded to something a bit more recent? I have a notion that up
13 matches
Mail list logo
