On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, AmirBehzad Eslami
wrote:
> We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
> a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
>
> We were thinking to implement the solution as "Stored Procedures"
> instead of a PHP solution that runs SQL
Hi,
We were thinking to implement the solution as "Stored Procedures"
> instead of a PHP solution that runs SQL queries, but an article in
> Coding Horro recommendeds to avoid SP for good reasons:
The article shows only one thing. that common practice should be to 'do
everything where it belongs
Am 17.02.13 17:00, schrieb AmirBehzad Eslami:
> Dear list,
>
> We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
> a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
I don't understand what you want?
Queries are executed sequentially or do you plan to create a
multi-process PH
Dear list,
We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
We were thinking to implement the solution as "Stored Procedures"
instead of a PHP solution that runs SQL queries, but an article in
Coding Horro recommendeds to a
On 12/15/2011 01:05 PM, Alex Pojarsky wrote:
I'm not sure I've understood you correctly, but you may try something
like the following primitive autoloader (I didn't debug it, it's just
an example):
class Base
{
protected $_path = '';
public function construct($base_path)
{
I'm not sure I've understood you correctly, but you may try something
like the following primitive autoloader (I didn't debug it, it's just
an example):
class Base
{
protected $_path = '';
public function construct($base_path)
{
$this->_path = $base_path;
}
public func
Hello,
I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These files contains classes named
the same as files. So in file connect.php is class Connect. These f
Hi guys,
I try to applied your solutions but I have problems whit it. I need to
achieve this schema( -> is something like ../ it means that it is one
level up folder):
connec.php(class Connect MySql)->
select.php(class Select MySql) ->
-> mysql.ph
Sent from a handheld device
On 08-Dec-2011, at 11:14 PM, "Dominik Halvoník"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
> applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
> files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These f
On 8 Dec 2011, at 17:14, Dominik Halvoník wrote:
> I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
> applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
> files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These files contains classes named
> the same as files
Hello,
I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These files contains classes named
the same as files. So in file connect.php is class Connect. These f
Extended classes may have their own constructors which are implicitly
called, and as Jonathan mentioned, the constructor of any ancestors (ie. the
parent) must explicitly be called.
If the child (extended) class does NOT have it's own constructor method
defined, the parent's constructor is called.
Hey,
Constructors behave the same way as regular methods with inheritance,
you have to manually call the parent constructor, ie:
parent::__construct().
Regards,
Jonathan
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:45 PM, APseudoUtopia wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm writing my own class which extends upon the Memcac
Hey list,
I'm writing my own class which extends upon the Memcached class
(php.net/memcached).
I'm a bit confused as to how the constructor works when extending a class.
class caching extends Memcached {
function __construct() {
echo "Caching Class Construct!";
}
}
For something like the above
On Sunday 20 December 2009 1:08:46 pm you wrote:
> >> Maybe this would be the perfect opportunity for the php autoload
> >> functions...?
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help/thoughts/comments,
> >> dK
> >> `
> >
> > Yep, this is a textbook case for a proper autoload setup. And no,
> > cramming all of
On Sunday 20 December 2009 10:35:56 am Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Hello PHPers,
>
> I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
> all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
> they all have slight variations as well. The approach I took was to
> m
Set up autoloading:
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.autoload.php
Cheers,
Rob.
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello PHPers,
I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
they all have slight vari
Hello PHPers,
I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
they all have slight variations as well. The approach I took was to
make an abstract core class, and each of the 60 objects extends that
co
sage-
> From: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
> Sent: 26 July 2009 19:46
> To: PHP General
> Subject: [PHP] OOP Design Software
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
> track of my methods and properties of my obje
t; Caner.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
> Sent: 26 July 2009 19:46
> To: PHP General
> Subject: [PHP] OOP Design Software
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
> track of my
19:46
To: PHP General
Subject: [PHP] OOP Design Software
Hello,
Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
track of my methods and properties of my objects. My memory is not what
it used to be, and i'd like to have a quick 'overview' or layout of al
Hello,
Is there an objected oriented programming software that can help me keep
track of my methods and properties of my objects. My memory is not what
it used to be, and i'd like to have a quick 'overview' or layout of all
the objects I have to work with. Maybe the software would even let make
One final update.
The way one sets the path to required files is very important. I found it is
best to use instead of relative paths.
Regards
Julian
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Julian Muscat Doublesin <
opensourc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Update.
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> First of all, thank yo
Update.
Hello Everyone,
First of all, thank you all for your input. I ran a sinmple test using the
suggestions you gave me and and require_once.
Using firebug to test the output, I got an internal server error. I found
out what the problem was.
What I am doing is I have classes which represent
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Eddie Drapkin wrote:
> autoloading doesn't do anything but follow a set of logic rules to decide
> what file to require, so it doesn't mess with opcode caches at all.
umm.., right, but what do you think happens at the center of that logic ?
require / include ca
autoloading doesn't do anything but follow a set of logic rules to decide
what file to require, so it doesn't mess with opcode caches at all.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Tony Marston <
> t...@marston-home.demon.co.uk
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Julian Muscat Doublesin <
opensourc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is the first time that I am posting in the PHP forum, so hope that I
> am
> osting in the right place.
>
> I would like to say that before submitting to this forum I have done some
> r
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> "Eddie Drapkin" wrote in message
> news:68de37340905280801m6964d355l2d6d8ef773f3b...@mail.gmail.com...
> > There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
> > incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to sa
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 16:17 +0300, Olexandr Heneralov wrote:
> Hi!
> Do not use low-level AJAX.
> There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
> Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
> work.
>
>
> 2009/5/28 Lenin
>
> > 2009/5/28 kranthi
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
On 5/28/09 7:31 AM, "Julian Muscat Doublesin"
wrote:
> I had been programming in ASP.NET for years using Object Oriented
> Princeliness but decided to walk away from that. I am now researching and
> specialising in the open source world.
yay!
> I have started to develop a project using MySQL,
"Eddie Drapkin" wrote in message
news:68de37340905280801m6964d355l2d6d8ef773f3b...@mail.gmail.com...
> There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
> incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself
> time
> so that I can spend more time writing that
There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself time
so that I can spend more time writing that structured and efficient code of
which you speak. And the problem with what you're saying is that you still
have
"Eddie Drapkin" wrote in message
news:68de37340905280737t3e1ad844y188ab8fa08f17...@mail.gmail.com...
> Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
> require statements = :(
If you are too lazy to write "require" statements then you are probably too
lazy to write readab
Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
require statements = :(
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> wrote in message
> news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
> > Two things:
> >
> > 1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/fo
wrote in message
news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
> Two things:
>
> 1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of
> foo/bar.php)
> 2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
> anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a mu
2009/5/28 Olexandr Heneralov
> Hi!
> Do not use low-level AJAX.
> There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
> Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
> work.
>
>
> 2009/5/28 Lenin
>
> > 2009/5/28 kranthi
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > i recommend you firebug firefox
Hi!
Do not use low-level AJAX.
There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
work.
2009/5/28 Lenin
> 2009/5/28 kranthi
>
> >
> >
> > i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you
> > can see all
2009/5/28 kranthi
>
>
> i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you
> can see all the details of the communication between client and
> server)
> and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case)
> library instead of highly limited plain javascript
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must!
On May 28, 2009 8:49am, kranthi wrote:
i never faced such a proble
i never faced such a problem and i can assure you that it will never
happen. try...
main.php
second.php
test
call main.php via AJAX and see the responseText.
many things can go wrong in your coding. dont come to the conclusion
that this particular thing is not working.
i recommend you firebug
Julian,
could you please show us an example of this problem?
--
João Cândido de Souza Neto
SIENS SOLUÃÃES EM GESTÃO DE NEGÃCIOS
Fone: (0XX41) 3033-3636 - JS
www.siens.com.br
"Julian Muscat Doublesin" escreveu na mensagem
news:5e0039ed0905280431o2e9d8036u217b0449eccd...@mail.gmail.com..
Hi Everyone,
This is the first time that I am posting in the PHP forum, so hope that I am
osting in the right place.
I would like to say that before submitting to this forum I have done some
research looking for a solution without success.
I had been programming in ASP.NET for years using Object
Java is really awesome at OOP and it is great for teaching OOP or,
shall we say "illustrating OOP".
OOP is a programming technique in general without any bias towards any
programming language.
Good background on OOP concepts is essential in learning language
specific OOP implementation.
So don't wo
gt; >
> > However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
> of
> > the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
> that's
> > where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
> >
> &g
A loosely typed language like PHP might not be the best choice for teaching
OOP, because even though PHP makes it easier with loose types, you should
know about them and how they are stored etc.
PHP is a great language but maybe not strict enough for students to
understand all the errors that can
At 9:36 AM -0500 2/10/09, Andrew Ballard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Carlos Medina
wrote:
> Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
> Hi @ all,
but this is a php list...
Regards
Carlos
Yes, it is, but the original question was about OOP and not
specifically about PHP. It seems fair enough
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Carlos Medina wrote:
> Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
>>
>> Paul M Foster wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:02:37AM -0500, tedd wrote:
>>> As a side note, I think students should learn a language like C before
>>> learning something like Perl, Python or PHP. Having
Where I study, Intro to OOP is taught in C# using Visual Studio 2003 and
further OOP concepts are taught in Java, with the academic computer science
of OOP alongside.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Carlos Medina wrote:
> Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
>
>> Paul M Foster wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009
Marcus Gnaß schrieb:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:02:37AM -0500, tedd wrote:
As a side note, I think students should learn a language like C before
learning something like Perl, Python or PHP. Having to deal with
defining/declaring variables and their storage methods before
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:02:37AM -0500, tedd wrote:
As a side note, I think students should learn a language like C before
learning something like Perl, Python or PHP. Having to deal with
defining/declaring variables and their storage methods before use I
think makes fo
few years AND C++ appears to
> be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
>
> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
> of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
> that's where all programming
and popular OOP language.
>
> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
> because of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal
> opinion is that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's
> just my opinion.
>
> With th
cific language is
> required
>
> I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++ appears to
> be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
Yes C++ is not bad for this, but it has also got some flaws.
>
> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open
Paul M Foster wrote:
> PHP is *not* a good example for OO. There are a lot of OO principles
> it doesn't follow.
>
> I would have suggested Smalltalk, the original OO language, except
> that no one uses it any more, and other languages don't necessarily
> fully implement OO as done in Smalltalk.
AND C++ appears to
>> be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
>>
>> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because of
>> the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is that's
>> where al
and popular OOP language.
>
> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
> because of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal
> opinion is that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's
> just my opinion.
>
> Wit
resting, people need to see how concepts are
> applied to understand how they work -- thus I think a specific language is
> required
>
> I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++ appears to
> be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
>
&g
tedd wrote:
> I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
> appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
I would agree, although I suspect Java is also a good candidate.
> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering i
tedd wrote:
> I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
> appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
I would agree, although I suspect Java is also a good candidate.
> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering i
le I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
With that said, what's the differences and advantages/disadvantages
be
AND C++ appears to
>> be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
>>
>> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because
>> of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is
>> that's where all programming
re applied to understand how they work -- thus I think a
specific language is required
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
OOP language.
>
> However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because of
> the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is that's
> where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion.
>
> With that said
applied to understand how they work -- thus I think
a specific language is required
I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++
appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language.
However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it
Hi,
How do I call methods from classes that are inherited? I want to add a
mysql_num_rows() function to a second class that is an addon to a MySQL
query in the first class. The first class will be used in several different
classes for different parts of the site so I don't want to directly add the
Dear my friend, Jim Lucas.
Thank you very much for your help. You've solved my problem one more time.
I really appreciate your help.
===
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:17:02 -0700
Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Lucas wrote:
> > Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
> >> Dear Jim,
> >>
> >> thanks for your
Jim Lucas wrote:
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
"
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents
complete all contry name
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
"
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents complete all contry name from all over the
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
"
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents complete all
contry name from all over the earth. How come the query
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
You've solved my problem, Jim. Thank you very much.
Now, my code give the output as my expectation:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
negara->
".
But come another problem, namely: the $negara is empty. I tried to read the documentation on
"
http
Dear Jim,
You've solved my problem, Jim. Thank you very much.
Now, my code give the output as my expectation:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
negara->
".
But come another problem, namely: the $negara is empty. I tried to read the
documentation on
"
http://www.php.net/manual/en/
A few missing pieces in your code. Take a look below within your class. I
corrected it.
try also using include_once instead of require
and make sure that your error level and reporting are turned on so you can see
what is happening.
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear my friends,
This is the fi
> Theoritically if Class "koneksi" is being initialized than it
> prints "koneksi berhasil (connection succeeded)" but it doesn't.
What "does" it? Just nothing? No warnings at all? Possibly disabled?
so far
rob
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://w
what sort of error are you encountering ?
-nathan
On 8/15/07, Patrik Hasibuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear my friends,
>
> This is the first time for me to use OOP concept of PHP. I wrote still a
> very simple codes but it doesn't work as my manual book taught. the book
> titled "MySQL/PHP
Dear my friends,
This is the first time for me to use OOP concept of PHP. I wrote still a very
simple codes but it doesn't work as my manual book taught. the book titled
"MySQL/PHP Database Application" by Jay Greenspan say these lines should work
but in fact it don't work as expected.
Here is
Stut wrote:
This is a question of design, not a question of whether to use OOP.
For example, in several of the sites I maintain I have classes that
inherit from a base class called Table. The base class provides a lot
of the basic methods for working on a table (think ActiveRecord). It
also ha
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-15 13:59:39 -0700:
> As I cannot think of a class-based way to build my report, I think
> I'll use a customer class everywhere BUT in the report. Inside the
> report I'll just use one SQL statement instead of dozens
> of instances and hundreds of queries.
>
> I'll ma
As I cannot think of a class-based way to build my report, I think I'll use a
customer class
everywhere BUT in the report. Inside the report I'll just use one SQL
statement instead of dozens
of instances and hundreds of queries.
I'll make a note inside the class that this and that method is not
"Ed Lazor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Stut wrote:
>> Youch!! Your implementation seems to be focused on development
>> efficiency rather than runtime efficience. In all but rare research
>> projects this is backwards for a web-ba
"Ed Lazor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
>> What a coincidence! That's exactly my approach, but I've taken it one
>> step
>> further. I always start with a properly normalised database which I can
>> then
>> im
"Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ed Lazor wrote:
>> On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Stut wrote:
>>> If I then go on to create an admin interface for the users, I would
>>> create another completely separate class called UserCollection to handle
>>> more than one
"Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tony Marston wrote:
>> "Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> My general approach to designing a system is data-centric. I tend to
>>> start by defining the database schema since getting t
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Stut wrote:
Youch!! Your implementation seems to be focused on development
efficiency rather than runtime efficience. In all but rare research
projects this is backwards for a web-based system. This is exactly
the practice I am trying to discourage. It's a well-
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
What a coincidence! That's exactly my approach, but I've taken it
one step
further. I always start with a properly normalised database which I
can then
import into my daa dictionary application. From there I can press a
button
and create a c
On 10/13/06, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ed Lazor wrote:
> ...Or is it something else entirely; I dunno, maybe
> UserCollection has a property defined as an array of User class? I
> think that's what people were saying earlier in the thread as being a
> "very bad thing" in terms of memory ut
long run
to just implement it myself - at least then I know exactly what it's
doing and how, which makes it easier to fix and optimise later.
To relate that twoddle to PHP... OOP is a stable, mature methodology.
However, OOP in PHP is fairly new (if you ignore PHP4's pitiful
efforts) and
Tony Marston wrote:
"Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My general approach to designing a system is data-centric. I tend to start
by defining the database schema since getting that clear in my head tends
to lead me to a decent design.
What a coincidence
up with one
> place where it all happens, and you can choose how much of the internal
> workings are exposed to the rest of the system.
>
> I'd also like to say that OOP itself is not hype. In the same way that
> podcasts themselves are not hype. It's what surrounds stuff
Please include the list when replying to that others may benefit (or
suffer) from the discussion.
Bruce Cowin wrote:
I like your static user class. Does the user instance then get saved to a
session variable that is serialized/unserialized on every page?
There is no user instance as such
that I'd probably aim for all classes to
be good enough for public consumption, but I know that takes more
time in development.
Podcasting is the next stage of audio and video entertainment in
the same way that colour TV was all those years ago.
*cough* AskNinja.com RULES! hehe *cough*
To
hose years ago. They hype exists because of the cruddy media-driven
world we now live in where everything has to be hyped up if it's going
to be popular, even if it's short-lived.
To relate that twoddle to PHP... OOP is a stable, mature methodology.
However, OOP in PHP is fairly n
""Richard Lynch"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, October 12, 2006 3:11 am, Tony Marston wrote:
>> I have to disagree as well. There is absolutely nothing wrong which
>> the
>> approach of creating one class for each table in the database. It
>> cannot be
>>
Comments / Questions below.
On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Stut wrote:
Except that is the attitude that leads to painful OOP in PHP. PHP
is not the same environment as C++.
The environment (classes, objects, etc) needs to be created and
destroyed with each request.
I definitely agree that P
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-12 16:29:09 -0500:
> On Thu, October 12, 2006 1:03 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
> >> I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
> >> fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without
>
On Thu, October 12, 2006 1:03 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
>> I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
>> fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without
>> knowing
>> all the rooms that are needed...
>
> Sorry to
Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
Sorry to jump into the middle of the conversation, but
Richard Lynch wrote:
I *still* don't see OOP as a Right Answer for spitting out HTML web
pages in optimized minimalist time frames...
Maybe my brain just got warped by all that AI/Lisp work I did for a
couple decades, but it feels to me like a bad selection of weapons for
the task at hand, most
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
Sorry to jump into the middle of the conversation, but I thought this
On Thu, October 12, 2006 8:24 am, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> [use the archives]
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
I agree that all the code samples you provided be
On Thu, October 12, 2006 3:11 am, Tony Marston wrote:
> I have to disagree as well. There is absolutely nothing wrong which
> the
> approach of creating one class for each table in the database. It
> cannot be
> wrong for the simple reason THAT IT WORKS!
Only problem is that then you often end up
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
