On Dec 16, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Yousif Masoud wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Philip Thompson
> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2009, at 6:03 AM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 02:53 +, Joseph Masoud wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14 Dec 2009, at 22:01, Ashley Sheridan
> >> wrote:
> >>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Philip Thompson wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2009, at 6:03 AM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 02:53 +, Joseph Masoud wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14 Dec 2009, at 22:01, Ashley Sheridan
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 15:59 -0600, Philip Thompso
On Dec 15, 2009, at 6:03 AM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 02:53 +, Joseph Masoud wrote:
>>
>> On 14 Dec 2009, at 22:01, Ashley Sheridan
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 15:59 -0600, Philip Thompson wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Lester Caine wrote
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:03:23PM +, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> I've always been led to believe that you go with MySQL if you want
> speed, Oracle if you want data integrity. I know they both handle each
> one admirably, but Oracle is known more for guarding the data against
> mishaps and
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 02:53 +, Joseph Masoud wrote:
> On 14 Dec 2009, at 22:01, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 15:59 -0600, Philip Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> >>
> >>> Lenin wrote:
> You might also like this:
> >>>
Philip Thompson wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Lenin wrote:
You might also like this:
Come on Monty - Lukas Smith http://bit.ly/5lmwwD
I've been watching some of this debate with interest, but I'll stay with a
database that has none of the baggage that MySQL has alw
On 14 Dec 2009, at 22:01, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 15:59 -0600, Philip Thompson wrote:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Lenin wrote:
You might also like this:
Come on Monty - Lukas Smith http://bit.ly/5lmwwD
I've been watching some of this debate wi
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 15:59 -0600, Philip Thompson wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> > Lenin wrote:
> >> You might also like this:
> >> Come on Monty - Lukas Smith http://bit.ly/5lmwwD
> >
> > I've been watching some of this debate with interest, but I'll stay with a
On Dec 14, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Lenin wrote:
>> You might also like this:
>> Come on Monty - Lukas Smith http://bit.ly/5lmwwD
>
> I've been watching some of this debate with interest, but I'll stay with a
> database that has none of the baggage that MySQL has always had, and
Lenin wrote:
You might also like this:
Come on Monty - Lukas Smith http://bit.ly/5lmwwD
I've been watching some of this debate with interest, but I'll stay with a
database that has none of the baggage that MySQL has always had, and IS
currently replacing Oracle in many large sites :)
--
Les
You might also like this:
Come on Monty - Lukas Smith http://bit.ly/5lmwwD
rich...@rgraph.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You might have already seen this, however if you haven't this may interest
> you:
>
> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html
>
>
Sent my appeal to comp-merger-regis...@ec.europa.eu and I would suggest
everyone on this list does the same
Hi,
You might have already seen this, however if you haven't this may interest you:
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 canvas graphing: RGraph - www.rgraph.net (updated 12th December
- now with IE support!)
Lots of PHP and Javascript code - http
13 matches
Mail list logo