On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 18:21 -0500, phphelp -- kbk wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:03 PM, sono...@fannullone.us wrote:
>
> >> Depends on what you are including. The only tags that can be
> >> inside the
> >> head are , , ,
On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:03 PM, sono...@fannullone.us wrote:
Depends on what you are including. The only tags that can be
inside the
head are , , ,
- Original Message
> From: Tommy Pham
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2009 4:11:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Include Files in HTML
>
> - Original Message
> > From: "sono...@fannullone.us"
> > To: PHP General L
- Original Message
> From: "sono...@fannullone.us"
> To: PHP General List
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2009 12:57:08 PM
> Subject: [PHP] Include Files in HTML
>
> In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files being
> calle
On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Bob McConnell wrote:
Depends on what you are including. The only tags that can be inside
the
head are , , ,
"Bob McConnell" wrote:
> From: sono-io at fannullone.us
>
>> In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files
> being
>> called from within the tags, and other examples showing
>
>> them called within . I've always put them in the header
>
>> section myself, but I was wondering
From: sono-io at fannullone.us
> In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files
being
> called from within the tags, and other examples showing
> them called within . I've always put them in the header
> section myself, but I was wondering if one is better than the othe
In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files being
called from within the tags, and other examples showing
them called within . I've always put them in the header
section myself, but I was wondering if one is better than the other,
or is it just personal preference?
F
8 matches
Mail list logo
