> -Original Message-
> From: John Monfort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:08 PM
> To: Mark Roedel
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Best Practice-HTML In Database
>
>
> Yes, I will need to provide searching capabi
ot;The world is waiting, are you ready?"
-+___+-
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Mark Roedel wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Monfort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 10:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECT
> -Original Message-
> From: John Monfort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 10:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP] Best Practice-HTML In Database
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm curious. Which is the better practice?
&
Using an URL to point to an HTML page or file is
better.
Inserting the HTML page in the database would cause:
a) more database requests and thus heavy load on the
database
b) large amount traffic between the database server
and the web server
At my previous company we even ended up removing the
If you ever need to update the HTML, option 2 will be a lot easier.
Mick
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, John Monfort wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm curious. Which is the better practice?
>1) Insert the HTML page (...HTML code) in the database ?
>
>or
>
>2) Insert a URL in the dat
Hello everyone,
I'm curious. Which is the better practice?
1) Insert the HTML page (...HTML code) in the database ?
or
2) Insert a URL in the database field, that points to the HTML page?
why?
Any help will be appreciated.
Btw, thank you all for helping with my previous
6 matches
Mail list logo