Re: [PHP] Benchmarks

2001-03-18 Thread Zeev Suraski
It's much more than that. Perl doesn't cache compiled scripts either, or rather, its caching is extremely limited, and IMHO pretty much unusable (e.g., you have to restart the server every time a script changes). PHP alone is as fast as Perl (and slightly faster, as the benchmarks show). PH

Re: [PHP] Benchmarks

2001-03-16 Thread Pierre-Yves Lemaire
Third one would be http://apc.communityconnect.com/ ?? py - Original Message - From: Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 3:37 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] Benchmarks > On 16 Mar 2001 04:39:06 -0800, Phil Driscoll <[EMAIL

Re: [PHP] Benchmarks

2001-03-16 Thread Chris Adams
On 16 Mar 2001 04:39:06 -0800, Phil Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >http://www.perlmonth.com/features/benchmarks/benchmarks.html?issue=4&id=9351 >4159 > >A performance comparison of various web scripting languages. PHP does rather >well! It's also important to note that their comment that PH

[PHP] Benchmarks

2001-03-16 Thread Phil Driscoll
Posted in a discussion on Slashdot today was a this link: http://www.perlmonth.com/features/benchmarks/benchmarks.html?issue=4&id=9351 4159 A performance comparison of various web scripting languages. PHP does rather well! Cheers -- Phil Driscoll Dial Solutions +44 (0)113 294 5112 http://www.di