Hi -
Please help me quantify the risk of Apache 2.x with PHP 5.x.
Thank you for making the time.
If I missed this on php.net or apache.org or somewhere else,
please point me to the data. There is other good survey
info, but not the PHP 5/Apache 2 combo.
Reply to me directly and I'll summariz
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:13:37 -0800, Bart Baenisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe I understand the thread unsafeness problem, and I
think a reasonable cure is the prefork MPM for Apache 2, as
RedHat distributes.
If we decide to avoid the work of removing the Apache
2.whatever that RedHa
Hi -
I believe I understand the thread unsafeness problem, and I
think a reasonable cure is the prefork MPM for Apache 2, as
RedHat distributes.
If we decide to avoid the work of removing the Apache
2.whatever that RedHat distributes and building our own Apache
1.3.3whatever, are there an
-
From: "Greg Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] apache 2, mysql 5.0.1.rpm and php 5.0.2 on RH9
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 07:19:30 +0500, Haseeb Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 07:19:30 +0500, Haseeb Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a(net.o)(.text+0x9d0): first defined here
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make: *** [libphp5.la] Error 1
Does /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a actually exist? After you
installed MySQ
using >> apache 2, mysql 5.0.1 rpm install, php 5.0.2
i want to install php with both mysql and mysqli support. but everytime i get
this error. help please.
configure command
==
./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs --with-mysql=/usr
--with-mysqli=/u
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:33:54 +0200, Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com
> We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
> (prefork MPM).
I also have PHP 5 and Apache 2 running on some servers, as I need some
Apache Modules that are only available for Apache 2 ... Also, I r
We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
(prefork MPM).
worker MPM could be a problem though...
regrds,
Bostjan
On Thursday 23 of September 2004 10:28, Frédéric Hardy wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because
>
Hello -
I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because
some php library are not compatible with multi-threading.
But php 5 ?
Best regards,
Fred -
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
And following the last line - I'm still running Apache2 with PHP5 on
Windows on an increasing number of sites, without a single problem to
date ;)
I switched to Apache 2 and PHP 5.0.0 a week ago and hand no problems so
far (several hundred thousand hits each day). Apache 2 is running in
Would it be just fine if I activated Apache2's 'prefork' module? I know
preforking defeats Apache2 purpose, but I am still wondering if it should
still work fine. :)
"Lester Caine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
>
> > Wow! And come to think
Why is there such a reluctance to using Apache 2? For stability issues,
PHP should recommend Apache 2 but in prefork mode. Instead of saying
Apache 2 is unsupported, just say non prefork mode is not supported.
Additionally, if PHP is more acceptable of Apache 2 (in the supported
mode), then use
Curt Zirzow wrote:
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many problems.
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=108736540021355&w=2
It was this or another message b
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
When I started playing with this, I had a windows machine onto which I
tried installing Apache1. After a couple of days of frustratio
* Thus wrote Oliver John V. Tibi:
> Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
> Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
I would stay with stick with apache 1.x.
The only reason I would consider apache2 is if there was a module
only available
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
--
Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode).
"Live free() or die()."
"Lester Caine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
>
>> Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
>
> You can, if it works for you, but ...
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=107916708217647&w=2
>
> --
> Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz
Apache2 had
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
> Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
You can, if it works for you, but ...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=107916708217647&w=2
--
Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Syste
Hi,
I just wanted to post almost the same question: PHP for Apache 2 is
idling around for years now. configure --with-apxs2 is still marked as
[EXPERIMENTAL] and the documentation still warns:
"Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on
Unix nor on Windows."
What is t
Chris Hayes wrote:
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=108736540021355&w=2
Very well explained. Untill now this problem was explained to me with a
lot of techno mumbo jumbo, and I could not make sense of it. But now I
think I really understand what's going o
At 18:55 19-7-04, you wrote:
> >I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
> >Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
> >
> >
> Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
> PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just
* Thus wrote raditha dissanayake:
> Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
> >Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
> >
> >
> Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
> PH
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Thanks and Cheers!
--
Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode).
"Live free() or die()."
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To un
it in production; however, it is
not 100%. There are some issues with the multi-thread (not 100%).
I wish they would adjust the information on the PHP apache 2 manual page
from:
*Warning*
Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on
Unix nor on Windows.
To something more
Hello there,
Does someone know if Apache 2 support in PHP is stable when using Apache
2 as prcoess spawning only, I mean, no threads.
Somebody has seen performance improvements in Apache 2 when compared to
Apache 1.3??
I know it is experimental because of the threads configuration in the
new Apa
Thanks Chris. I just compared the trans_sid on the dev box and it is
set to 1. I'll make that change and report in. Many thanks. Owe you
another beer if that was it. ;)
Chris
>>> "Chris Shiflett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/26/04 10:41AM >>>
--- Christopher Ditty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I re
--- Christopher Ditty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently upgraded to apache 2.0 from 1.23.x on my server.
1.3.x you mean? :-)
> The sessions are still working, however, the session information is
> not being transfered via the url.
[snip]
> session.use_trans_sid = 0
There's your answer.
I recently upgraded to apache 2.0 from 1.23.x on my server. Previously,
I had sessions working using the database to store session information.
I recently noticed that this is no longer working as it did. The
sessions are still working, however, the session information is not
being transfered via t
A few months back the official PHP website still warned againts PHP and
Apache 2. I am wondering about the current status of these two technologies
when used together. I am about to configure a web server and was going to
use Apache 1.3 with PHP4+ as opposed to Apache 2 with PHP4+. What are your
op
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 6, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Yves Arsenault; PHP-General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP
Yves:
I am not sure of the exact technical issues that affect it, but when I
was
forced to use it in a production environment (does anyone actually admit
to
CHOOSING to use it
-Original Message-
> From: Martin Hudec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 5 décembre 2003 10:52
> To: PHP-General
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using Apache 2.0.48 with PHP 4.3.4 installed
> from Gentoo
ould anyone know of the issues that might affect PHP 4.3.4 and Apache
2.0.48 ?
Thanks,
Yves
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hudec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5 décembre 2003 10:52
To: PHP-General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP
Hi there,
when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using Apache 2
Would anyone know of the issues that might affect PHP 4.3.4 and Apache
2.0.48 ?
Thanks,
Yves
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hudec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5 décembre 2003 10:52
To: PHP-General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP
Hi there,
when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using
Hi there,
when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using Apache 2.0.48 with PHP 4.3.4 installed
from Gentoo portage. It was running <10 smallscale php/mysql based
virtualhosts without any difficulties.
On Friday 05 December 2003 15:24, Yves Arsenault wrote:
> Is this warning outdated?
> http://www.php.ne
Hello,
This may be very old, but I thought I would ask.
Is this warning outdated?
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.apache2.php
"Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on Unix
nor on Windows."
I'm running RedHat 9.
I've got Apache 2.0.48 running and was ready to in
Yep I forgot to mention that it is off by default :). Hmmm nice to know that
there is shorter name :). Thanks for info, I haven't used PHP for long time.
On Monday 24 November 2003 17:13, Chris Shiflett wrote:
> To add to this, if register_globals is disabled by default, it is likely
> that you'r
--- Martin Hudec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what you're looking for is called Register Globals which is turned
> off, therefore you just cannot use $variable but must use
> $HTTP_POST_VARS['variable'].
To add to this, if register_globals is disabled by default, it is likely
that you're using a v
Hello,
what you're looking for is called Register Globals which is turned off,
therefore you just cannot use $variable but must use
$HTTP_POST_VARS['variable'].
It is turned off for security reasons and can be usually find in php.ini file
(ask your system administrator).
On Monday 24 Novembe
[snip]
Forgive me if you've already addressed this, I'm trying to post some
variable to a php sript and they just arn't registering if i use the
code
below it get's the variable and it's contents
";
reset ($HTTP_POST_VARS);
while (list ($key, $val) = each ($HTTP_POST_VARS)) {
echo "$key =>
Forgive me if you've already addressed this, I'm trying to post some
variable to a php sript and they just arn't registering if i use the code
below it get's the variable and it's contents
";
reset ($HTTP_POST_VARS);
while (list ($key, $val) = each ($HTTP_POST_VARS)) {
echo "$key => $val";
washy | www.amazon.com/o/registry/EGDXEBBWTYUU
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Fernando Melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2003 08:53
> Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP & Apache 2
>
>
>
wishy washy | www.amazon.com/o/registry/EGDXEBBWTYUU
- Original Message -
From: "Fernando Melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2003 08:53
Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP & Apache 2
And when will it be considered stable
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 14:53, Fernando Melo wrote:
> And when will it be considered stable? It's been a while since Apache 2 was
> released. PHP needs to speed up for its own good.
Maybe soon, maybe never. This question is covered in a lot of FAQ's on
the web. Please search google if you are inte
And when will it be considered stable? It's been a while since Apache 2 was
released. PHP needs to speed up for its own good.
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2003 11:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP & Apache 2
On
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 11:22:38AM +0200, Fernando Melo wrote:
:
: I would like to use apache 2 in a production environment, but initially
: there seemed to be some issues with the PHP module. Does anybody know
: if it is ok use it now or is it still buggy with apache 2?
The combination of PHP 4.
Hi everyone,
I would like to use apache 2 in a production environment, but initially
there seemed to be some issues with the PHP module. Does anybody know if it
is ok use it now or is it still buggy with apache 2?
Fern
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: htt
We have a detailed whitepaper on the subject.
Please check out: http://www.zend.com/whitepapers/PHPandApache2-ZendWhitepaper.pdf
BY
__
Brad Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.zend.com
Zend - The PHP Company
>
>Hi All,
>
>Can anyone aswer this simple question, that i stil
Hi All,
Can anyone aswer this simple question, that i still have not found it
anywhere...
Is PHP capable of running on Apache 2.x and if so what version ?
And is it stable ?
Thankxs for any reply
Miguel Angelo
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://w
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3.
> Hi!
>
> When I am laoding php as module:
> LoadModule php4_module c:/php/sapi/php4apache2.dll
>
> I get the following error:
> Apache.exe: module "c:\php4build\snap\sapi\apache2filter\sap
Hi!
When I am laoding php as module:
LoadModule php4_module c:/php/sapi/php4apache2.dll
I get the following error:
Apache.exe: module "c:\php4build\snap\sapi\apache2filter\sapi_apache2.c" is not
compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020628, need 20020903).
Please contact the vendor for
t; > Verzonden: donderdag 7 november 2002 16:26
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP
> >
> >
> > Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for
> > production environments. Are there any further updates?
> >
Thanks for your reply, Davy. We are running *nix boxes, so I don't have any
thoughts on XP and Apache.
Kirk
> -Original Message-
> From: Davy Obdam [mailto:info@;davyobdam.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:29 PM
> To: Johnson, Kirk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
this?
Best regards,
Davy Obdam
mailto:info@;davyobdam.com
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:kjohnson@;zootweb.com]
> Verzonden: donderdag 7 november 2002 16:26
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP
>
>
> Last I hear
I heard mentioning a few more month for them to get working stably.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Johnson, Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
> Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production
> environments. Are there any further updates?
>
> What is the best way t
Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production
environments. Are there any further updates?
What is the best way to keep up on the status of this? Any good sites in
particular?
TIA
Kirk
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n
At http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-4.php#4.2.0 there is a note (Note: Apache2
support is EXPERIMENTAL.)
Is this note still justified for PHP/4.2.2? Is it about security?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
There is a note at http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-4.php for Version 4.2.0
(Note: Apache2 support is EXPERIMENTAL.)
Is it still justified?
adu
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
/usr/local/include/pth/pth.h:526: warning: this is the location of the
previous definition
In file included from /usr/local/apache/include/apr_portable.h:90,
from /usr/local/apache/include/http_protocol.h:64,
from sapi_apache2.c:38:
/usr/local/include/pth/pthread.
configure again
--
Aaron Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Developer
- Original Message -
From: "Mitch Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "php-general" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:16 PM
Subject: [PHP] Apache 2 support broken?
> With php 4.2
With php 4.2.2 I get this when trying to compile with apache 2 support:
Making all in apache2filter
/bin/sh /usr/local/download/apache/php-4.2.2/libtool --silent --mode=compile
gcc -I. -I/usr/local/download/apache/php-4.2.2/sapi/apache2filter
-I/usr/local/download/apache/php-4.2.2/main
-I/usr/lo
Hello,
when will be possible to compile php as static module with apache 2?
Regards,
Michal Dvoracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:32:13AM +0200, Jiri Mikulas wrote:
> sapi_apache2.c: In function `php_input_filter':
> sapi_apache2.c:248: too many arguments to function `ap_get_brigade'
I haven't looked that much at the code, you could perhaps try to
simply remove the last parameter... Not sure how w
Hi.
I have this problem with compiling PHP 4.0.6 for Apache-2.0.16_1
instaled from port on FreeBSD 4.4-release
---
Making all in apache2filter
...
ad -c sapi_apache2.c
sapi_apache2.c: In function `php_input_filter':
sapi_apache2.c:248:
64 matches
Mail list logo
