Robert Cummings wrote:
BTW, could someone get behind me and give that stick thing that's poking
out a pull. I've been having trouble walking lately ;)
Not a chance in hell I'm going near that!!
Ps. I apologize in advance to anyone who accidentally got caught up in
some errant mental image
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:18 +0100, Stut wrote:
> Richard Davey wrote:
> > I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
> > guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
> > PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
> > manageable sect
Richard Davey wrote:
I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire
process, s
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yay, some decent arguments! I don't deny any of them, I only take
exception to being called an 'idiot' by yourself for the OS I have to
use.
I apologize. I meant it in a stereotypical, M$-hating, sort of way..
nothing towards you personally.
Hi Greg,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 7:23:47 PM, you wrote:
>> Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
>> with some kind of valid OS argument, please.
> 1. The virus and malware protection racket - M$ spent billions of
> 2. Perpetual Upgrading - you can use Ubuntu Linux 6
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I envy those who's work is specific / targeted enough for them to be
able to only use Linux on their desktop, I really do (and I say that
without a hint of sarcasm, I promise). For the rest of us, the choice
sadly isn't as black and white.
I
Hi Robert,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 7:01:00 PM, you wrote:
> I had 500 things I wanted to change, then I switched from Windows to
> Linux in 2000 and found that they had been addressed. Sure enough
> though, I'm working on a new list. There's only a few things on it
> though ;)
I envy those who's
Hi Lester,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 6:24:44 PM, you wrote:
> How about installation time. Just clocked up 6.5 Hours re-installing XP on a
> machine. To get the last linux machine to the same level - 20 mins.
> Of cause running Eclipse - it does not matter what the OS is :(
Yeah I'd take installat
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please.
1. The virus and malware protection racket - M$ spent billions of
dollars and several years making Vista and just like normal it'
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 01:44 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote:
>
> > Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
> > with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
> > 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:13 -0400, Jason Pruim wrote:
> On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >>> Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
> >
> >> I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still suc
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 12:46 -0400, Jon Anderson wrote:
> Richard Davey wrote:
> > Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
> >
> > * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives
> > you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll.
> > Inter
On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote:
> Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
> with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
> 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
> worth taking seriously.
In a roundabo
Richard Davey wrote:
Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
worth taking seriously.
How about installation time. Just clocked up 6.5
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
>> Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
> I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
> idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone i
On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is enou
Hi Greg,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
>> Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
> I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
> idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is enough to make me
> throw up.
Viruses? God, that old
Hi Jon,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:46:12 PM, you wrote:
> I find it funny that the addition of the numbers above would logically
> put me in the 0% category.
You could select multiple operating systems from the list. 50% of them
used Linux too. It didn't show how the results were mixed though, i.
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is enough to make me
throw up.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.co
Richard Davey wrote:
Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
* I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives
you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll.
Interestingly, 70% of them use Windows XP for development.
I actually use a co
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 17:19 +0100, Richard Davey wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:01:18 PM, you wrote:
>
> >> There's always one ;)
>
> > No, there's more than one.
>
> Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
>
> * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and
Hi Greg,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:01:18 PM, you wrote:
>> There's always one ;)
> No, there's more than one.
Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
* I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives
you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who too
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suggestion: get rid of Windows XP and use a real OS
There's always one ;)
No, there's more than one.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.
Hi Robert,
Thursday, May 17, 2007, 4:43:14 PM, you wrote:
> Suggestion: get rid of Windows XP and use a real OS
There's always one ;)
> You have "previously" and "the past" redundancy since
> previous implies the past and past implies previous.
Fixed :)
Cheers,
Rich
--
Zend Cert
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:26 +0100, Richard Davey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
> guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
> PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
> manageable sections and
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
manageable sections and contains ove
Hi all,
I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire
process, so you won't go
27 matches
Mail list logo
