> But a double-submit is likely to come from separate Apache processes, so
> I don't see where the pid comes into the picture. If I reload a page and
> resend the post data, that POST request is going to be processed a second
> time most likely by a different httpd process. What you need to
"Joshua Beall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You should look into the WDDX functions - http://php.net/wddx/ - they give
> you an XML document that you can edit by hand much more easily than the
> bytestream you get from serialize. Howeve
"Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joshua Beall wrote:
>> I am doing some work where I want to do locking, and prevent scripts from
>> running in parallel. I see that I could use the semaphore mechanism, but
>>
"GamblerZG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Output of serialize() is barely readable and definetely is not suited for
> manual editing.
>
> It is quite simple to create var_export() clone that does not add junk to
> it's output. But then I would need to exec() the s
Hi All,
I am doing some work where I want to do locking, and prevent scripts from
running in parallel. I see that I could use the semaphore mechanism, but
I'd like for my code to be portable, and that extension is not enabled in
many places.
I need some way for a process to uniquely identify
"Greg Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The other day a post came across one of those mailing lists discussing
> PHP security. One of the posters was describing how insecure PHP's
> file upload functionality is and went on to explain a simple method of
> attach
"David Dickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I was told that PEAR has too much overhead to be considered for a large
>scale site. Does any one feel the same? Is this an outrageous comment? I
>would like to hear comments from people who are using PEAR, or people w
"Adam Bregenzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Honestly, I didn't see anything glaringly wrong so I deftly skirted your
> problem by posting code that I find works. :)
Hmm, I would probably have done the same :-)
> One part that may be an issue is you are using eac
"Adam Bregenzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Having a function to undo magic quotes can be very useful if you
> distribute your application. Here is what I use, just call
> disable_magic_quotes(). It should not do any damage if magic_quotes is
> already disabled.
Hi All,
I originally posted this on 2004-02-09, to alt.comp.lang.php, alt.php, and
comp.lang.php, with the followup-to header set to comp.lang.php. Nobody had
any thoughts, so I thought I would post here, just in case.
I want to turn off magic quotes. I realize in retrospect that using a
.htacc
10 matches
Mail list logo
