> even APD is not up to the task
>
> xdebug trace http://devzone.zend.com/article/2871 is sufficient, but
> the output will be in a separate file.
> Thank a lot.
>
> APD is just doing what I was looking for.
>
> --
> Satya
> Bangalore.
Regards
> That won't do what the OP asked, it will just return a list of all the
> functions defined, which could be a lot more than is actually being used
> in a process, such as in the case of included libraries of functions.
uhm, right, I guess APD then:
http://uk3.php.net/manual/en/book.apd.php
Reg
http://uk3.php.net/manual/en/function.get-defined-functions.php
get_defined_functions
Regards
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:54:34 +0530
> From: astra.sat...@gmail.com
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Is there any way to get all the function name being called in
> aprocess?
> Hi,
>
> If a windows web server is being used, we've had very good results with the
> activex control (use via COM within PHP5) from
> http://www.acasystems.com/en/web-thumb-activex/
>
> The developer is very responsive to bug reports / feature suggestions. Full
> PHP example code is given fo
> Given the knowledge (or extremely likely probability) of the
> non-existence of a PHP only solution for generating website thumbnails
> it follows that my suggestion was absolutely applicable.
I have never said the opposite ... I have just said: pure PHP with standard
core functions/librari
> is
> there a way to somehow embed the contents of the xml into the php code
> (like using <<< EOF for html), and being able to substitute the
> template match string for a variable ?
>
> Any ideas ?
XSLT should be used via modules, as is with match and templates indeed.
The only idea is
> I see you are being rather obtuse :|
I use system/shell calls without problems if there is the lib I need.
The problem here is that the question was, in my opinion, the classic: how to
assign javascript var to php (directly)
Indeed he is trying to find a PHP solution, of course with third pa
> GD is just a library that PHP uses, in a similar way that you'd be
> utilising what khtml2png can do through PHP. What you just said doesn't
> make much sense.
except I cannot find anything in both php.net and pecl websites
Regards
__
> > Thanks,
> >
> > I checked the faq of their website. They say that I must have an an X
> > session. I don't host myself my website.
> > I want something that I can use only by using cpanel. What i want
> > basically is allow the user to enter the url of a website. And the
> > script must
Regards
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:40:47 -0400
> From: rob...@interjinn.com
> To: an_...@hotmail.com
> CC: reseas...@gmail.com; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Create a screenshot of a website
>
> Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> > What you see is what a brows
What you see is what a browser engine renders for your eyes while what you can
do with PHP is a snapshot of the source code.
Regards
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:28:15 -0400
> From: reseas...@gmail.com
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Create a screenshot of a website
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think it is about readability:
>
> $arr[3] = 'test';
> $test = 3;
>
> //This prints "$test"
> echo "This doesn't work: $$arr[3]";
>
> //This prints 3
> echo "This works: ${$arr[3]}";
>
> Using the same type way as before in this thread.
Above example is a classic one where readabil
> So no they are not meant to go around. You can use them this way as well.
that has almost the same meaning of
$_ = '_POST';
echo count($$_);
which again, for readability brackets are suggested to improve maintainability
$_ = '_POST';
echo count(${$_});
Regards
> Erm, the braces are meant to go *around* the variable, not around a bit
> of it:
>
> print "Test: {$var[0][0]}";
unrelated, just another usage of curly brackets
$_ = 'abc';
$i = 0;
echo $_{++$i}; // b
Regards
__
Curly brackets are usually highlighted as well so it is a good practice,
generally speaking, to use them for double quoted strings and maintainability
increase automatically.
Regards
> From: esam...@barc.gov.in
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:31:53 +0530
> Subject:
I so much avoid the silent char that sometimes I even forget this exists.
I guess it is worth it for this case.
Regards
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:28:06 +0200
> From: dotanco...@gmail.com
> To: php@emax.dk
> CC: a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Sani
even better
$error_reporting = error_reporting(0);
if(mysql_real_escape_string($variable) === false)
{
error_reporting($error_reporting);
// create a default DB connection
} else
error_reporting($error_reporting);
unset($error_reporting);
> From: an_...@hotmail.com
> To: a...@ash
> If says:
>
> Returns the escaped string, or FALSE on error.
>
> So all you have to do, is have warnings turned off (as it generates an
> E_WARNING if you have no active connection) and then look at the return
> value of a call to the function:
>
> if(mysql_real_escape_string($variable) === fa
> Your only option might be to do something "smart". You can't use the
> proper mysql functions without a connection to a database, but you
> refuse to connect to a database until after you perform validation...
>
> You do realise you can have several db connections open at one time, so
> you co
Specially suited for Ajax interaction, you may be interested into Formaldehyde:
http://code.google.com/p/formaldehyde/
Regards
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:39:14 -0700
> From: xwis...@yahoo.com
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Built-in Debugging
>
> Hello,
>
> Will be ever see b
e?
> From: larstor...@gmail.com
> To: an_...@hotmail.com
> CC: magda.hasib...@yahoo.co.uk; php-general@lists.php.net
>
> 2009/10/13 Andrea Giammarchi :
> >
> >> > curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT, 0);
> >>
> >> I wouldn't recommend settin
> > curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT, 0);
>
> I wouldn't recommend setting this to 0 unless you're very sure that
> the connection will succeed; otherwise, your script will hang
> indefinitely waiting for the connection to be made.
agreed, it's just he set timeout to zero so I guess he m
> $ch = curl_init($url);
> $fp = fopen('/tmp/curl.out', 'w');
> curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_FILE, $fp);
> curl_exec($ch);
>
> Error checking etc. is of course left up to you. :)
oops, I sent directly the file name. Let me reformulate the code then:
set_time_limit(0);
$fp = fopen('stream.
I guess this should work
set_time_limit(0);
$ch = curl_init($siteURL);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, false);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_BINARYTRANSFER, true);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT, 0);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_FILE, 'stream.bin');
curl_exec($ch);
Regards
> From: magd
bitwise right shift is probably the fastest cast to int so far ... still in
many languages, intval is a function call
being a cast in both cases (int) is good as well ... bitwise, casting, works
with strings, arrays, boolean, whatever as well.
I don't think there is any difference in php, exce
> Couldn't this be done with just simple math functions?
indeed:
$a = 28.56018;
$b = $a * 10 % 10 >> 0;
Regards
_
Windows Live Hotmail: Your friends can get your Facebook updates, right f
> Hmmm... Didn't think about this, but % only works with int values
it was just future prof precaution since this statement is false for many other
languages.
In few words I am not sure PHP6 does the same ... never mind so far
Regards
__
> But, first, you need to use get_magic_quotes_gpc() to see if magic_quotes_gpc
> is
> turned on. If so, you need to run stripslashes() on your variables before you
> run the mysql_real_escape_string() on them.
>
>
> if ( get_magic_quotes_gpc() ) {
> $_POST = array_map('stripslashes', $_P
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 02:07:55 -0700
> From: adam.p.reyno...@gmail.com
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Correct handling _POST[] and implode. PHP5
>
>
> I just realised I have get_magic_quotes_gpc turned on and was not catering
> for arrays.
>
that's why I asked about P
> so it's simple, it's not an array, but your assignment magically makes it an
> array since you wrote "iterate over the array" ... very, very clear, isn't it?
OK, sarcasm a part, this works perfectly for me, and it's quite obvious Colors
IS an array ...
Green
Yellow
Red
> Its very obvious that $_POST["color"] is not an array.
>
> do something like this and you wil get the values.
>
> $arr_color = $_POST["colors"];
>
> //iterate over the array
> foreach($arr_color as $val)
> {
> $str_color .= ", " . $val;
> }
so it's simple, it's not an array, but your a
>
> echo $_POST['Colors'] . ''; // outputs 'Array'
try with
echo '', var_dump($_POST['Colors']), '';
to be sure abot the structure. Also, which PHP version?
Regards
_
Keep your friends
> Easy there hoss, no need to get worked up.
In my opinion, being blamed for natural optimizations is the most ridiculous,
hilarious, anti professional behavior I have ever seen ... but you are right,
no need to get worked up, so have fun here.
Regards
> This is a great talk / slideshow and definitely is a better way to
> drive home the point that PHP execution speed is relatively
> meaningless in terms of user experience. Well, at least up to a
> point...
if it takes 0.1 per response, with 10 users will be 1 second to wait ... if it
takes
I don't get why for you code style means effort, waste of time ... I bloody
write code, how do you write a loop?
The same as I do ... except I put ++i rather than i++ ... does it change
ANYTHING?
For you no, for me yes ... whre is the drama here? I cannot spot it, it's like
saying: I don't kn
>
> I can write a test[1] that comes out with these results:
> String concat time: 0.18807196617126
> String interpolation time: 0.14288902282715
> Where using " is faster than ' ! Common wisdom be damned!
where is the test? ... and, is that kind of test where you put 12345678
variables ins
So far I stopped at the first line, the constructor, where I can spot with what
I can read SQL injections "everywhere"
I hope here is a proper validation there, 'cause as is, sounds truly dangerous,
since you are not using bindParams or other PDO related techniques to avoid
input problems.
Ab
> So while we can debate computing considerations of today, tomorrow
> those will be less important. That was the point I was making. Why
> not focus on things that make significant difference and let the
> insignificant fade into history.
I tendentiously focus on all things able to make, all
> if used properly, could avoid recursion, and speed up operations ... there is
> nothing wrong with goto, everything we write on lowest level is a jump in the
> memory (as goto is a jump in the code flow)
>
> ++goto ... and not goto++
I forgot, I have always used goto in Batch script, which
> Speaking of starting a conversation, what do you think about the "goto"
> construct introduced just recently?
if used properly, could avoid recursion, and speed up operations ... there is
nothing wrong with goto, everything we write on lowest level is a jump in the
memory (as goto is a jump
> Eddie:
>
> And thanks for supporting my point.
so you think as well that 3 characters, written like this i++, in a careless
way, or like this ++i, make the difference about time spent to develop ...
interesting
Regards
ah ah ah that's for sure, I've never said that is correct, I said that is
illogical ;-)
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo
> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:46:36 -0500
> From: jblanch...@pocket.com
> To: an_...@hotmail.com; tedd.sperl...@gmail.com; php-ge
> Furthermore, the amount
> of time micro-optimization takes up (going through old code, I mean)
> could be better spent doing something that actually does increase your
> performance, like implementing a search engine or memcached. Going
> forward, if you're aware that ++i and i++ are the same
.net
> From: tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo
>
> At 3:56 PM +0200 10/6/09, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> > > Does these behaves exactly?
> >> for($i=0; $i<10; ++$i)
> >> for($i=0; $i<10; $i++)
&
> Does these behaves exactly?
> for($i=0; $i<10; ++$i)
> for($i=0; $i<10; $i++)
different benchmarks showed ++$i is usually faster than $i++
In that loop case, yes, what's happen internally is exactly the same, $i will
be from 0 to 9, in the other case obviously is not the same.
but pre increm
> It will be an accident
> if you get the results you are expecting.
I agree that the operation is illogical, I must disagree about accidents.
In PHP that operation will mean assign to the new $a variable the value
returned from the other $a variable before the increment.
There is no mystery
> but is implicitly converted into strings when it is entered.
use floatVal($str1) === floatVal($str2) then ... I honestly cannot spot any
problem in what you wanna do, I can just spot an error in the root of the
process: threat strings as numbers, comparing potatoes and tomatoes ...
there a
> There's a useful function called headers_sent() which checks to see if
> the headers have already been sent to the browser. This might be a good
> place to throw into your code at various points to check and see if
> something is being written which you don't expect.
true, check that as well,
> Sorry, the .phps file wasn't updated, but the page still works as
> expected even though I've printed stuff after the header (i tested that
> just for fun).
I already said magic behavior are not part of my developed code, unrelated
output is an error, even if the download work, it is an err
AFAIK, you can create snaps from ActionScript, but you cannot save browser
rendered plug-in content via PHP
It's more like canvas.toDataURL, it requires to be rendered, unless you don't
have InDesign or something similar able to render internally and export as
image.
Regards
> Date: Mon, 5 Oc
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:11:12 +0100
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Developer Question [DOMDocument]
>
> On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:59 +0200, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
>
> >
> > > search engines aren't case-sensitive!
> >
> > ... try to search php.net or PHP.NET
My apologies I read search engines ARE case sensitive ... never mind, still
DomDocument and DOMDocument are the same.
Regards
> From: an_...@hotmail.com
> To: a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk; mickael+...@lupusmic.org
> CC: php-general@lists.php.net
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:59:43 +0200
> Subject: R
> search engines aren't case-sensitive!
... try to search php.net or PHP.NET in Google and you'll obtain exactly the
same result ... in PHP strtolower and strToLower are exactly the same, as the
same is DomDocument, DOMDocument, or DOMDOCUMENT, at least in PHP 5.3
If you used an early versio
saveXML and transform it via XSL
It should be simple since basically the only thing you have to do is to
replicate everything adding right at the beginning and nothing
else.
Is this solution suitable for your requirements?
Regards
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 01:45:03 -0700
> From: mpet...@mac.c
Did the OS update changed the default locale settings or the default date
format?
> From: fres...@adex-intl.com
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:05:05 -0400
> Subject: [PHP] strtotime strangeness
>
> For some reason the strtotime is no longer returning the year
> por
> Thank you, worked beautifully.
just don't ignore this:
PHP 5 >= 5.2.0
if you are trying to create something portable, you should consider a Pear
fallback ...
if(!function_exists('json_encode')){
require_once 'JSON.phps';
// http://mike.teczno.com/JSON/JSON.phps
function json_en
quot;links" at the end of the
page ...
Regards
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:09:35 +0200
> From: php@emax.dk
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Header problem
>
> Hello Andrea
>
> Andrea Giammarchi wrote on 2009-10-04 18:49:
> >
> > &
> Afaik, the content length header is not necessary, but it will cause
> problems if it's set and it's wrong.
correct, missed Content-Length means the classic download with useless progress
bar and undefined estimation time, problematic for preloader as well in case of
images, swf, generic dat
> Header must come first (before you output anything) or you get a parse
> error
I try to better explain ...
HTTP works like this: you ask something, you receive something, html and texts
are just one option.
Your example page mess up html, zip, everything, because when you download a
file
> I'm thinking (hoping) there is already a php class somewhere for
> generating JavaScript object strings that I can instead of my ugly
> easily breakable way of doing it.
>
> Anyone know of one?
json_encode
http://uk3.php.net/manual/en/function.json-encode.php
Regards
> All very messy!
there is nothing messy, the logic is well defined and for a loose type language
it's absolutely normal behavior.
Regards
_
Keep your friends updated—even when you’re no
> $a = 2260; $b = 226e1; $c = 2.26e3; $d = 2260.0;
>
> $a==$b==$c==$d,
>
> and
> $b===$c===$d
$b , $c, and $d are the same indeed ... they represent the floating point
2260.0 in I think every language ... it's like saying that 1.0 is not 1.
... both floating point numb
You introduced the word "suddenly", it's about 10 years I develop in PHP
Regards
> PHP allows you to do either. If I find myself being more strict in no
> way does that mean I'll suddenly jump to another language. It just means
> I have a bit of code that requires a bit more strictness. Shoul
if we compare via "==" there is an implicit cast to the most primitive form.
These are all true, and all have a reason, and make sense:
// (int)'abc' is 0
var_dump('abc' == 0);
// 'abc' is not an empty string
var_dump('abc' == true);
// 2 is not 0, which would be casted into false, so it's tru
> ... and, in fact, that /is/ how C behaves. The following code:
>
> int a = 2;
> a = a++;
> printf("a = [%d]\n", a);
>
> Will output "a = [3]". At least on Ubuntu 9 using gcc 4.3.3.
>
> So I retract my initial terse reply and apologize for misunderstanding
> your question.
>
> Ben
It's not t
Do you want users download the file or the zip?
do you send other headers before the download?
It's
quite a common error to set a default header in PHP at the beginning of
whatever application, while header should be used as last exit point
and never in the middle, or at the beginning, of a resp
And then you discover ===
$i = 0; $j = count ($names); while ($i < $j)
{ if ($names[$i] === $target) { break; }
++$i;
}
... regards
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> From: clanc...@cybec.com.au
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 21:21:00 +1000
> Subject: [PHP] A really wacky design decision
>
> D
> Several ways that I can think of:
>
> * use the file_get_contents() which like you said, could be
> overkill
> * shell out to wget to retrieve just the headers for the path.
> You'd be looking for a 200 return code, which indicates the URI
> exists.
>
> I have updated a php to version 5.2.11.
you should update the keyboard as well, it fires CTRL+V twice (subject, and I
am joking ..)
> When I run the following script:
> print date('d M Y, H:i');
> ?>
> It's returns a correct time.
correct accordingly with your local time zone, 'cause I am
> $the_string = 'Марина
> Орлова';
did you actually wrote this or i tis the PHP ml that converted utf-8 chars?
I can read only an ASCII string with length 85 ... please tell me you are not
confusing HTML entities with UTF-8 encoded characters ...
__
Unless PHP Gtk has a module able to create an interface able to capture
coordinates in a touchscreen device ... PHP is a web server programming
language and it usually works in the server specially suited for web based
applications.
Regards
> From: man...@dotzoo.net
> To: php-general@lists.ph
>
> Question I was Asked by Andrea- "mod_reqrite or .htaccess is the answer, but
> I wonder why you choose /user/username rather than just /username a la
> twitter."
>
> I will be using many other aspects of my users something like
> "/projects/username/"; "/gallery/username/".
well, it does
> I think this sort of issue arises particularly because of the
> misconception that PHP is embedded inside HTML pages. Once a person has
> that idea in their head, they will start to work with an HTML template
> and add PHP as necessary. While that can work, in cases such as this,
> it's best to
> Maybe people really have started to rtfm!
>
> Ash
well, apparently not everybody, somebody put right now a header call in the
middle of the page declaring "there're no white space around, I've checked it!"
maybe other realized that a search in the manual takes less time than a mail
here ..
> You can not pass this myPHPvar javascript var as an input in a form. if you
> want to change its value and maintein it, must to use an static var, and
> only can access to this values via javascript functions where an event is
> invoked (in case you want to read or write values)
with all due
Actually, it's even more simple ... forgive me:
echo 'var
myPHPvar='.json_encode($myPHPvar).';';
that's pretty much it
> From: an_...@hotmail.com
> To: jonathan.desarro...@gmail.com; mail2gautambha...@gmail.com
> CC: saeed@gmail.com; php-general@lists.php.net
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:01
> basicly is use hidden inputs as a container for php variables, and transform
> through js.
really? I though the other way round was extremely simple:
echo 'var
myPHPvar=eval("('.addslashes(json_encode($myPHPvar)).')");';
why would you use hidden input, plus DOM to get data, etc, etc?
_
> In a lot of the work I do these days I have to support IE6 because it's
> the defacto browser in various government departments. It'll be sometime
> before it is completely ousted.
Rob, same is for me, I have to deal with this "browser" all problems it has
every single day, 'cause financial
> I have to disagree Ash, you can pass js variable values to PHP but only
> through a page load. Then you could use $_REQUEST, $_POST, $_GET to retrieve
> it. I have done this before.
And I am sure Ash does it on daily basis, the problem is the used therm: I want
to *assign* ... not pass, assig
> At that point I would consider IE6 "broke".
Every standard conformance test can tell you since years that IE6 is broken. At
that point, you'll be exactly in the same situation, if your customers do not
want to update for same reason they are not doing right now, why would you
leave them "al
I wonder what should happen if your customers will ask you PHP 3 applications
because their internal server is that old ... and I mean your *current*
application for PHP3 ... well, IE 6 has the same impact for the Web Development.
I am not saying we can dismiss its support, specially if we work
> I wonder if massive uploads, like the ones you're coding for, really
> aren't that common. I can imagine hard-coding that 3600 myself, and
> thinking, "no way someone's going to be uploading a single file for
> longer than an hour, or even close to it."
me too, also because for a silly connect
> Yeah, the rules say to snip out parts of the convo which aren't
> pertinent, but I know I don't exactly follow that one either! :-/
>
> Thanks,
> Ash
> http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
to be honest the problem is that I am in hotmail rather than gmail here, and
this page is not clever as gmai
> If he´s really using a any other charset instead of utf8 table, why not
> using utf8_decode and utf8_decode in his php files to solve this?
let's say PHP could have a different charset than the one defined in that MySQL
table so this is not a portable solution, specially if you do not perfe
> I don't recall him saying that a utf8 table was not an option or that he
> wasn't using one.
I know 'cause he replied directly to me rather than this ML
>
> Also, try not to top post ;)
I usually hate scroll 'till the end to find often a single row as reply ...
I'll try though
>
> Thanks
He has no utf-8 charset in the table, so the first point is valid and
htmlentities is the function (
http://uk.php.net/manual/en/function.htmlentities.php )
You need to remember that in this way you need to use htmlentities for
*everything*, specially for searches, otherwise ° against ° will b
does JavaScript use the proper way to encode strings as encodeURIComponent is,
and for each sent key/value pair?
Is MySQL table charset ut8_general_ci ?
If not, do you convert sent UTF-8 charset into table charset?
In few words we miss the way/library used to send data, the default PHP
charset,
This is what I said, except if you want to grab the content you need to request
HEAD first and eventually GET, and this is slower than just GET parsing headers.
In any case, curl is the answer, imho.
Regards
Requesting only the headers is a lot faster than requesting the headers AND the
file
> The way I've always seen this approached before is by using the wget
> command, which can be asked to just return the headers for a page. In
> your case you'd be looking for all 200 codes, which means that all the
> sites are up. This is faster than asking to return a full image each
> time.
>
> While it's a joke, in all fairness, it does work.
only because you debugged before server side responses, and now, as I have
said, you have an alternative to speed up that process.
Finally, Formaldehyde JS had a typo so only today I realized it and I uploaded
the version 1.01 of Formalde
>
> While it's a joke, in all fairness, it does work.
only because you debugged before server side responses, and now, as I have
said, you have an alternative to speed up that process.
Finally, Formaldehyde JS had a typo so only today I realized it and I uploaded
the version 1.01 of Formalde
I have already said I am sorry and I explained the reason I replied in such
joking way.
Now, I am sure you can understand, since you say you use this ML for
recruitment as well, that it would be nice to leave this "subject" as
clear as possible.
I would even suggest authors to create a new
e other thing, I looked at a canned media management web app ($875
> US) that will do this uploading, and it doesn't require APC, so there
> definitely is some way to do this with basic PHP.
>
> Thanks, Phred
>
>
>
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Andrea Gia
Wht is exactly your problem?
If I am that bad I have simply removed myself from the list of possible
candidates, if I ever had a chance.
Keep blaming other feeling the ruler here does not put you in a better position
than a troll.
I am sorry for the original message 'cause I thought recruiters
people, you need somehow to discuss with them,
> creating a relationship based on trust.
>
> Best,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
> wrote:
> >
> > I guess I got instantly fired with "than" rather than "then" ... nevermind
&
I guess I got instantly fired with "than" rather than "then" ... nevermind
> From: an_...@hotmail.com
> To: jer...@cyber-duck.co.uk; php-general@lists.php.net
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:56:59 +0200
> Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP GURU NEEDED
>
>
> You are looking for me than, cool!
>
> > Date: Mon,
You are looking for me than, cool!
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:38:17 +0100
> From: jer...@cyber-duck.co.uk
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] PHP GURU NEEDED
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Cyber-Duck are looking for a highly motivated PHP / CSS Guru to join our
> award-winning, London bas
The concept of my last link is this:
the instant before you do the upload you ask PHP to scan the tmp folder, or the
folder used to upload files (often the tmp) and you snap number of files, then
the upload starts, and it will create a temp file with a PHP predefined prefix,
you array_diff the
reat, perhaps you have some
> insight into my narrow APC problem.
>
> One other thing, Eddie was talking about APC not being thread-safe. I
> have heard this before, but also heard it refuted. Do you have any
> insight on this?
>
> I am going insane, so any help you can toss
I am not sure why you ended up with Flash, but here there is a good old example
with APC:
http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2007/10/upload-progress-bar-with-php5-apc-and.html
Regards
> CC: php-general@lists.php.net
> From: phpl...@planetphred.com
> To: oorza...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 200
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
