Hi, good evening!
I'm working with an database from and older application (Firebird 1.5) and
I need some help to implement the PDO:Firebird in our projects at work. If
anybody could give me some light in this case, I would be very happy to
implement PDO with Firebird from now on.
Until last month
On 09/20/2012 10:00 AM, Matijn Woudt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
On 09/20/2012 02:35 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Plaseplease update... 5.1.6 is from 2006! I read the "it's required",
but I can't imagine _anything_ that it's worth it to use such an
extremely outdate
Am 20.09.2012 18:17, schrieb Maciek Sokolewicz:
On 20-09-2012 18:03, Jim Lucas wrote:
On 09/20/2012 02:35 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Plaseplease update... 5.1.6 is from 2006! I read the "it's required",
but I can't imagine _anything_ that it's worth it to use such an
extremely outdated, unsuppo
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 02:35 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
>>
>> Plaseplease update... 5.1.6 is from 2006! I read the "it's required",
>> but I can't imagine _anything_ that it's worth it to use such an
>> extremely outdated, unsupported and therefore insecu
Am 20.09.2012 18:03, schrieb Jim Lucas:
On 09/20/2012 02:35 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Plaseplease update... 5.1.6 is from 2006! I read the "it's required",
but I can't imagine _anything_ that it's worth it to use such an
extremely outdated, unsupported and therefore insecure and inefficient
ver
On 20-09-2012 18:03, Jim Lucas wrote:
On 09/20/2012 02:35 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Plaseplease update... 5.1.6 is from 2006! I read the "it's required",
but I can't imagine _anything_ that it's worth it to use such an
extremely outdated, unsupported and therefore insecure and inefficient
versi
On 09/20/2012 02:35 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Plaseplease update... 5.1.6 is from 2006! I read the "it's required",
but I can't imagine _anything_ that it's worth it to use such an
extremely outdated, unsupported and therefore insecure and inefficient
version... You know: There are 3 (!) new min
On 20-09-2012 13:48, Rango wrote:
Hi,
I host a flash painting tool on my site, and wanted to add ability for the
users to add a background image from a given url, but I have to make sure
the url they add truely refers to a real jpg file, and not something else.
I found a methoed with exif_image
Hi,
I host a flash painting tool on my site, and wanted to add ability for the
users to add a background image from a given url, but I have to make sure
the url they add truely refers to a real jpg file, and not something else.
I found a methoed with exif_imagetype() that worked except my webho
Plaseplease update... 5.1.6 is from 2006! I read the "it's required",
but I can't imagine _anything_ that it's worth it to use such an
extremely outdated, unsupported and therefore insecure and inefficient
version... You know: There are 3 (!) new minor versions available right
now (5.2, 5.3 and
You can use regex to check the
format: /^\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/
You can also explode $ip on "." and check if every part is numeric and less
than 255.
On 20 September 2012 14:44, lx wrote:
> Hello:
>I want to use filter_var function by this way:
>
> $ip = "1
Hello:
I want to use filter_var function by this way:
$ip = "192.168.0.1";
if( !filter_var($ip, FILTER_VALIDATE_IP) )
{
echo "IP is not valid";
}
else
{
12 matches
Mail list logo