Re: [PHP] To ?> or not to ?>

2012-04-04 Thread Lester Caine
Robert Cummings wrote: I'm not alone then :) But I prefer EVERY tag to be closed ... perhaps that would change if the IDE's faked a closing tag when it's missing so they don't get flagged as an error :( IDE? Get off my lawn!! ;) I develop in JOE. But that does not provide any of the VCS/DVC

Re: [PHP] To ?> or not to ?>

2012-04-04 Thread Robert Cummings
On 12-04-04 04:40 PM, Lester Caine wrote: ( forget email addres :( ) Robert Cummings wrote: On 12-04-04 02:42 PM, Lester Caine wrote: Tedd Sperling wrote: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with "?>" or not? Just as long as no one proposes making leaving out compuls

Re: [PHP] To ?> or not to ?>

2012-04-04 Thread Lester Caine
( forget email addres :( ) Robert Cummings wrote: On 12-04-04 02:42 PM, Lester Caine wrote: Tedd Sperling wrote: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with "?>" or not? Just as long as no one proposes making leaving out compulsory ;) While I can sort of understand the

Re: [PHP] To ?> or not to ?>

2012-04-04 Thread Robert Cummings
On 12-04-04 02:42 PM, Lester Caine wrote: Tedd Sperling wrote: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with "?>" or not? Just as long as no one proposes making leaving out compulsory ;) While I can sort of understand the logic when the file is all php and just has an open

Re: [PHP] To ?> or not to ?>

2012-04-04 Thread Lester Caine
Tedd Sperling wrote: Let me start a religious war -- should one end their scripts with "?>" or not? Just as long as no one proposes making leaving out compulsory ;) While I can sort of understand the logic when the file is all php and just has an opening closing tags AND using totally wrong?

Re: [PHP] learning resources for PHP

2012-04-04 Thread Bastien
Bastien Koert On 2012-04-03, at 10:39 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hello list, > > I am quite sure that you've heard this question at least a few times > before. :) But I have been dabbling a bit in PHP for years and I've > decided that its' high time that became serious about getting a solid > g

[PHP] PEARX - A lightweight non-installer-dependent PEAR channel library.

2012-04-04 Thread Lin Yo-An
Hi folks, Since we can't just use the channel info feature from PEAR, Pyrus installer without installers, and it's hard to reuse. To implements Onion packager, I wrote a lightweight PEAR channel client library (PEARX) , without Installer dependency (like PEAR or Pyrus). PEARX - A lightweight no