Hi Paul,
As I agree some of your thoughts, I want to add my opinion also.
Yes the code should work. That is why we earn Money. If it doesnt work, then we
are on fire. But things like OOP or MVC weren't invented for a better running
code. They are invented so the codes will going to be much more
Hey Russell,
After Going through all the threads in this post, it is correct to say, GET
Rid of the space. Use "-" hyphen for SEO friendly URL's. Its completely
OK.
Other thing which is very handy is urlencode and urldecode functions. When
you are sending a query string use urlencode function.
Dear Sir,
Esco announces the launch of its NEW range of Pharmacon Downflow Booths for
Sampling and Dispensing applications.
Downflow Booths provide containment by utilizing high velocity air to capture
airborne dust particles. Downflow Booths are versatile devices that can
·
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:31:14PM -0700, Haig Davis wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have spent the entire day trying to get my calendar app to function
> correctly --- I have no problem with the actual functioning of the
> calendar. What is giving me trouble is for each calendar day the user has
> th
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:31:58PM +0100, David Otton wrote:
> 2009/10/7 Paul M Foster :
>
> > I think this is a bit extreme. It really depends on what's in your
> > parent model class. It could be something really simple, but something
> > you don't want to have to rewrite in every model you cod
Haig Davis wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have spent the entire day trying to get my calendar app to function
> correctly --- I have no problem with the actual functioning of the
> calendar. What is giving me trouble is for each calendar day the user has
> the option to check a checkbox requesting the
Thank you all for your replies.
The issue was "solved" for a better fitting solution on this case, that was
by using a regex expression.
I've not tested the difference between using == or ===. I was using !
But, the main question that is not clear on my newbie head is, "why how why"
couldn't th
2009/10/7 Paul M Foster :
> I think this is a bit extreme. It really depends on what's in your
> parent model class. It could be something really simple, but something
> you don't want to have to rewrite in every model you code. Thinking that
Have you got an example of something that is needed by
Hello All,
I have spent the entire day trying to get my calendar app to function
correctly --- I have no problem with the actual functioning of the
calendar. What is giving me trouble is for each calendar day the user has
the option to check a checkbox requesting the day off and additionally the
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:09:29PM +0100, David Otton wrote:
> 2009/10/7 Eric Bauman :
> >
> > On 7/10/2009 7:25 PM, David Otton wrote:
> >>
> >> 2009/10/7 Eric Bauman:
> >>
> >>> Any thoughts would be much appreciated!
> >>
> >> One observation. "Model" isn't a synonym for "Database Table" - mode
Are you using the == operator or === ?
maybe that's the problem
the function could return false or 0. You need to use the === operator
if( false !== ( $value = filter_var($value, FILTER_VALIDATE_INT)))
{
echo 'I need an Integer';
exit;
}
echo 'Thanks for the Int';
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:13 PM,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:52:00AM +0100, Russell Seymour wrote:
> Morning,
>
> I am trying to make my URLs more search engine friendly and I have come
> up against a problem.
>
> I want the following URL:
>
> mysite.example.com/articles/Test Story
>
> to be proxied to
>
> mysite.example.c
> Well, at a guess, if a number is 0, PHP see's that as equivalent to a
> false.
In this case, shouldn't php ignore the 0 as false?
> Also, numbers over 10 digits may be going over the limit for
> your
> PHP install, assuming PHP actually attempts to convert the string to a
> real integer for
> Also, I think you're getting confused over the zero with exactly what
> you are asking PHP to do. filter_var() returns true if the filter
> matches. If the 0 match is returned as a false, then filter_var() will
filter_var() actually returns the filtered data if the filter matches,
and FALSE if i
I'm using flowplay (flash) for embedded audio/video.
Initially I was using html5 w/ flowplay as fall back, but I stopped
because flowplay is better than html5 on browsers that support html5.
Anyway - I also am making direct links to the media available as mp4/ogm
and mp3/ogg.
The problem is
- Original Message
> From: Russell Seymour
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Sent: Wed, October 7, 2009 3:52:00 AM
> Subject: [PHP] Apache Rewrite Issues
>
> Morning,
>
> I am trying to make my URLs more search engine friendly and I have come up
> against a problem.
>
> I want the fol
From: tedd
To: php-general@lists.php.net; a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk; Daevid Vincent
Sent: Wed, October 7, 2009 12:42:41 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo
At 1:59 PM +0100 10/7/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>On Wed, 20
2009/10/7 Eric Bauman :
>
> On 7/10/2009 7:25 PM, David Otton wrote:
>>
>> 2009/10/7 Eric Bauman:
>>
>>> Any thoughts would be much appreciated!
>>
>> One observation. "Model" isn't a synonym for "Database Table" - models
>> can be anything that encapsulates business logic. Requiring all your
>> mo
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Ballard wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:42 PM, tedd wrote:
>
>> However, what I find wacky about all of this is:
>>
>> for($i=1; $i<=10; $i++)
>>{
>>echo($i);
>>}
>>
>> and
>>
>> for($i=1; $i<=10; ++$i)
>>{
>>echo($i);
>>}
>>
>>
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:42 PM, tedd wrote:
> However, what I find wacky about all of this is:
>
> for($i=1; $i<=10; $i++)
>{
>echo($i);
>}
>
> and
>
> for($i=1; $i<=10; ++$i)
>{
>echo($i);
>}
>
> Do exactly the same thing. I would have expected the first to print 1-10,
Morning,
I am trying to make my URLs more search engine friendly and I have come
up against a problem.
I want the following URL:
mysite.example.com/articles/Test Story
to be proxied to
mysite.example.com/index.php?m=articles&t=Test%20Story
I have the following rule in my Apache con
2009/10/7 Arno Kuhl :
> Thanks David. After taking another look at the description for ob_start() I
> began to suspect there was a difference, but the manual doesn't mention
> anything about it. And the fact they use the same terminolgy for both the
> settings and the functions is confusing. I can
At 1:59 PM +0100 10/7/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 08:54 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 6:15 PM -0700 10/6/09, Daevid Vincent wrote:
Except that:
$a = 123;
$b = $a++;
echo $b; //gives 123, not 124
as you logically expect it to and common sense would dictate, regardless of
what K&R
On 10/7/09 6:04 AM, "Ashley Sheridan" wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 10:57 +0100, MEM wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> I'm having this strange behavior, and I do not understanding why...
>>
>> When I use FILTER_VALIDATE_INT I'm unable to get, on my input box, values
>> starting with 0(zero), or v
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 12:03 +0100, MEM wrote:
> > Well, it was only a guess, but if you look at the integer limit on 32-bit
> > systems, you'll see that the upper limit > for numbers is 2147483647 (or
> > 2^31-1) which would explain maybe your upper limit problem.
> >
> > Also, I think you're get
> How is 0342352 being assigned to the variable that you're filtering?
> If PHP thinks it's a string, then the filter will fail. If PHP thinks
Oops, potentially bad information there as well, sorry. In general, a
string representation of a decimal number /will/ pass
FILTER_VALIDATE_INT. But your p
> How is 0342352 being assigned to the variable that you're filtering?
> If PHP thinks it's a string, then the filter will fail. If PHP thinks
> it's a number, it seems to convert it internally to the number 115946,
> before you get to the filter. Not sure what's going on there. At any
Sorry, bra
> If I put 0 filter_var() will return false.
Actually it returns the integer 0, not the boolean FALSE. Here's an
illustration of the difference:
http://codepad.org/73wff2u0
The integer value 0 can masquerade as "false" in an if() statement, of
course, as Ash pointed out above.
> If I put 034235
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:34:35PM +1100, Eric Bauman wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm in the process of trying to wrap my head around MVC, and as part of
> that, I'm attempting to implement a super-tiny MVC framework.
>
> I've created some mockups of how the framework might be used based
> around a ver
> Easy there hoss, no need to get worked up.
In my opinion, being blamed for natural optimizations is the most ridiculous,
hilarious, anti professional behavior I have ever seen ... but you are right,
no need to get worked up, so have fun here.
Regards
[snip]
...flame...
[/snip]
Easy there hoss, no need to get worked up.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> This is a great talk / slideshow and definitely is a better way to
> drive home the point that PHP execution speed is relatively
> meaningless in terms of user experience. Well, at least up to a
> point...
if it takes 0.1 per response, with 10 users will be 1 second to wait ... if it
takes
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Tom Worster wrote:
> just yesterday i was reading through this wonderful and very funny
> presentation:
>
> http://talks.php.net/show/froscon08/0
>
> for me it really drove home the message (among others) that it makes sense
> to find out where the real gains ca
I don't get why for you code style means effort, waste of time ... I bloody
write code, how do you write a loop?
The same as I do ... except I put ++i rather than i++ ... does it change
ANYTHING?
For you no, for me yes ... whre is the drama here? I cannot spot it, it's like
saying: I don't kn
just yesterday i was reading through this wonderful and very funny
presentation:
http://talks.php.net/show/froscon08/0
for me it really drove home the message (among others) that it makes sense
to find out where the real gains can be made before investing your efforts
in optimization.
--
>
> I can write a test[1] that comes out with these results:
> String concat time: 0.18807196617126
> String interpolation time: 0.14288902282715
> Where using " is faster than ' ! Common wisdom be damned!
where is the test? ... and, is that kind of test where you put 12345678
variables ins
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
>
>
>> So while we can debate computing considerations of today, tomorrow
>> those will be less important. That was the point I was making. Why
>> not focus on things that make significant difference and let the
>> insignificant fade into hi
So far I stopped at the first line, the constructor, where I can spot with what
I can read SQL injections "everywhere"
I hope here is a proper validation there, 'cause as is, sounds truly dangerous,
since you are not using bindParams or other PDO related techniques to avoid
input problems.
Ab
Speaking of.
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:dae...@daevid.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:21 PM
To: Jay Blanchard; 'Tommy Pham'; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs
++$foo
HEY! Don't try to hijac
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Eric Bauman wrote:
> On 7/10/2009 7:25 PM, David Otton wrote:
>
>> 2009/10/7 Eric Bauman:
>>
>> Any thoughts would be much appreciated!
>>>
>>
>> One observation. "Model" isn't a synonym for "Database Table" - models
>> can be anything that encapsulates business l
Hi All,
Might not be the correct place, but I hope someone in here can help me
with this problem.
running this from command line will execute correctly:
gm convert source -resize 600x800 dest
but running the same from within a script using exec() causes the
threads to hang, restarting apach
Arno Kuhl wrote:
>
> Thanks David. After taking another look at the description for ob_start() I
> began to suspect there was a difference, but the manual doesn't mention
> anything about it. And the fact they use the same terminolgy for both the
> settings and the functions is confusing. I can se
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 08:54 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 6:15 PM -0700 10/6/09, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> >Except that:
> >
> >$a = 123;
> >$b = $a++;
> >echo $b; //gives 123, not 124
> >
> >as you logically expect it to and common sense would dictate, regardless of
> >what K&R or anyone else says.
>
>
At 6:15 PM -0700 10/6/09, Daevid Vincent wrote:
Except that:
$a = 123;
$b = $a++;
echo $b; //gives 123, not 124
as you logically expect it to and common sense would dictate, regardless of
what K&R or anyone else says.
That's not the way I look at it.
$b = $a++;
means to me "take the val
On 7/10/2009 7:25 PM, David Otton wrote:
2009/10/7 Eric Bauman:
Any thoughts would be much appreciated!
One observation. "Model" isn't a synonym for "Database Table" - models
can be anything that encapsulates business logic. Requiring all your
models to inherit from Model is probably a bad id
> Well, it was only a guess, but if you look at the integer limit on 32-bit
> systems, you'll see that the upper limit > for numbers is 2147483647 (or
> 2^31-1) which would explain maybe your upper limit problem.
>
> Also, I think you're getting confused over the zero with exactly what you are
>
On 7/10/2009 7:36 PM, Mert Oztekin wrote:
Seems ok.
Just a thought:
Your model seems to be coded just for retreiving data. IMO you should
code it for all possible actions(insert,update,delete,select). And also it
should run without any database calls(you may create a new bank user in
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 11:19 +0100, MEM wrote:
> > Well, at a guess, if a number is 0, PHP see's that as equivalent to a
> > false.
>
> In this case, shouldn't php ignore the 0 as false?
>
>
>
> > Also, numbers over 10 digits may be going over the limit for
> > your
> > PHP install, assuming P
[sic]
> Before your e-mail, I've considering the use of this:
> if (!is_numeric($telefone))
> {
> $erros['numberofsomething'] = 'Error - only numbers please.';
> }
I meant this of course:
if (!is_numeric($numberofsomething))
{
$erros['numberofsomething'] = 'Error - only numbers please.';
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 10:57 +0100, MEM wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I'm having this strange behavior, and I do not understanding why...
>
> When I use FILTER_VALIDATE_INT I'm unable to get, on my input box, values
> starting with 0(zero), or values that are greater (in length) then 10
> digits.
>
Hello all,
I'm having this strange behavior, and I do not understanding why...
When I use FILTER_VALIDATE_INT I'm unable to get, on my input box, values
starting with 0(zero), or values that are greater (in length) then 10
digits.
I was expecting to be able to input the all range of integers.
From: djo...@gmail.com [mailto:djo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of David Otton
Sent: 07 October 2009 10:54 AM
To: a...@dotcontent.net
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Output buffering
2009/10/7 Arno Kuhl :
> According to the manual I shouldn't see anything at all when
> output_bufferi
2009/10/7 Arno Kuhl :
> According to the manual I shouldn't see anything at all when
> output_buffering is off (or if memory serves me correctly I should see an
> error about "headers already sent" or something). Looking at phpinfo
> confirms the value echoed by the script. Has something changed w
2009/10/7 Eric Bauman :
> Any thoughts would be much appreciated!
One observation. "Model" isn't a synonym for "Database Table" - models
can be anything that encapsulates business logic. Requiring all your
models to inherit from Model is probably a bad idea.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://
Seems ok.
Just a thought:
Your model seems to be coded just for retreiving data. IMO you should
code it for all possible actions(insert,update,delete,select). And also it
should run without any database calls(you may create a new bank user in a page
and use it than throw it away, so yo
Has there been a change to the way output buffering works?
The manual states for ob_get_contents()
"This will return the contents of the output buffer or FALSE, if output
buffering isn't active."
But the following works in php4.4.4 and php5.2.6 whether output buffering is
on or not
";
echo "o
Hi there,
I'm in the process of trying to wrap my head around MVC, and as part of
that, I'm attempting to implement a super-tiny MVC framework.
I've created some mockups of how the framework might be used based
around a very simple 'bank', but I'm trying to get some feedback before
I go and
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:15:54 -0400, tedd.sperl...@gmail.com (tedd) wrote:
>At 3:56 PM +0200 10/6/09, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
>> > Does these behaves exactly?
>>> for($i=0; $i<10; ++$i)
>>> for($i=0; $i<10; $i++)
>>
>>different benchmarks showed ++$i is usually faster than $i++
>
>"Faster" is a
> So while we can debate computing considerations of today, tomorrow
> those will be less important. That was the point I was making. Why
> not focus on things that make significant difference and let the
> insignificant fade into history.
I tendentiously focus on all things able to make, all
59 matches
Mail list logo
