Per Jessen wrote:
> Alain Roger wrote:
>
>
>> So in this case what is the plus for companies like MS, Google (with
>> Gmail), flicker and so on to use AJAX ?
>>
>
> For them (and others), it's about the user experience, and ajax is good
> at enhancing the user experience.
>
>
>> it is
Hello,
on 10/02/2008 11:31 PM Matt Graham said the following:
> I just saw this. If someone is in the Phoenix, AZ, USA area and wants a job
> writing/maintaining PHP code, this may be right for you. Contact details
> below:
You may want to post it here:
http://www.phpclasses.org/jobs/country
Alain Roger wrote:
> So in this case what is the plus for companies like MS, Google (with
> Gmail), flicker and so on to use AJAX ?
For them (and others), it's about the user experience, and ajax is good
at enhancing the user experience.
> it is on internet, so i guess they have a purpose to do
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:38 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:48 +0200, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
> > It depends how much stuff you have in the first div, it there are a lot of
> > images and the user will have to load them again (in case there is no cache)
> > and you care for t
So in this case what is the plus for companies like MS, Google (with Gmail),
flicker and so on to use AJAX ?
it is on internet, so i guess they have a purpose to do that.
mine is to have a responsive and intuitive interface application whatever it
is on internet or intranet.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at
Alain Roger wrote:
> Thanks tedd.
> basically page refreshin is not a problem for me as it in intranet
> application.
> however, AJAX offers some really nice thing and 1 from my point of
> view it's to reduce the network traffic by limiting what should be
> refresh/downloaded. in that way i think
At 5:39 PM +0200 10/4/08, Alain Roger wrote:
Thanks tedd.
basically page refreshin is not a problem for me as it in intranet
application.
however, AJAX offers some really nice thing and 1 from my point of
view it's to reduce the network traffic by limiting what should be
refresh/downloaded.
Thanks tedd.
basically page refreshin is not a problem for me as it in intranet
application.
however, AJAX offers some really nice thing and 1 from my point of view it's
to reduce the network traffic by limiting what should be refresh/downloaded.
in that way i think it is interesting.
On Sat, Oct
Hi gang:
While this may be trivial to many of you, I post this for the others.
In my last problem, which was caused by register globals being ON, I
wondered how I could fix this.
In my specific case, the client had "Register Globals ON" and his
host objected to turning if OFF saying that oth
At 12:10 PM +0200 10/4/08, Alain Roger wrote:
HI,
i'm currently working on some web application and i would like to know what
is the best way to do what i want.
basically like all application i have a menu and based on selected item menu
i want to display a page (basically 50 % of this new page
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 14:41 +0200, Alain Roger wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Ashley Sheridan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:48 +0200, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
> > > It depends how much stuff you have in the first div, it there are a lot
> > of
> > > images and the
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Ashley Sheridan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:48 +0200, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
> > It depends how much stuff you have in the first div, it there are a lot
> of
> > images and the user will have to load them again (in case there is no
> cache)
>
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 13:48 +0200, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
> It depends how much stuff you have in the first div, it there are a lot of
> images and the user will have to load them again (in case there is no cache)
> and you care for the traffic those images cost - it would be better to use
> AJAX.
>
Thiago Melo de Paula wrote:
What all this stuff have related to PHP?!?
Please, don't use this list to spam
Have you even read this list before??? I've not seen your name here
before and I've posted and contributed quite a bit over the last few
years so have a right to the odd indulgence on wh
It depends how much stuff you have in the first div, it there are a lot of
images and the user will have to load them again (in case there is no cache)
and you care for the traffic those images cost - it would be better to use
AJAX.
But generally - they both okay, I personally would use reload of
Seeing as Alex didn't say what this is about, it concerns XDR-TB or
Extremely Drug Resistant Tuberculoses. I've been hearing a lot about
this of late in several documentaries and have actually seen this video
already on TED.com.
Direct link for those who don't like mail tracking links:
http://
"Alain Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think both will be ok, it just depends on what's you want:)
> HI,
>
> i'm currently working on some web application and i would like to know what
> is the best way to do what i want.
> basically like all application i have a menu and based on selected i
HI,
i'm currently working on some web application and i would like to know what
is the best way to do what i want.
basically like all application i have a menu and based on selected item menu
i want to display a page (basically 50 % of this new page is DB result/grid.
As usual i have 2 divs, one
18 matches
Mail list logo
