> $result = mysql_query($sql_1);
You're running the wrong query.
You're building a query in "$update_sql" but running something else.
DUH!!!
Thats what you get for being up all night i guess! Time to hit the sack...
pulled an all nighter and its 7:24am now
>Some of the comments here:
>http:
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> I would like to find some samples to start with.
>
> We want to upload a picture and the user may apply some "filters" or
> "instructions" to create a new picture, based on the uploaded picture and
> the available "filters" and "instructions".
>
> The idea of it is not r
Ryan S wrote:
> This is really weird... i have tried the same exact code in phpmyadmin and it
> works like a charm, but when i run the script... no errors then i go to
> phpmyadmin and nothing has changed :(
>
> this is the code:
>
This is really weird... i have tried the same exact code in phpmyadmin and it
works like a charm, but when i run the script... no errors then i go to
phpmyadmin and nothing has changed :(
this is the code:
$how_many_to_
I got a Windows program, which can scan in a book by scanning in the pages
1,3,5, n turn the book by 180 degrees and scan in from the back side
n-1,n-3, ... 2. Then the program made a pdf book of the scanned in pages.
I am not sure if a php program is the right way to do, but I thought to do
I would like to find some samples to start with.
We want to upload a picture and the user may apply some "filters" or
"instructions" to create a new picture, based on the uploaded picture and
the available "filters" and "instructions".
The idea of it is not really mature, since we have no idea wh
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Mary Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Something in my program is eating up memory. I am running php 5 and
> hooking into postgres8.3, but I don't think it is a database program.
> The command in question works fine in psql, the problem comes in loading
Mary Anderson wrote:
> Thanks for responding.
>
> I hadn't realized memory_get_usage was available. That will be an
> enormous help.
>
> And I wasn't too clear in my note. Actually, it did not surprise me
> that the loop crashed the test code. I expected it to. What does
> surprise me is that
> // IF I RUN THIS THROUGH A LOOP:
> // for($j=0;$j<20, $j++){ $many_selected[$jj] = fu_bar($pg,
> $BIG_SELECT_cmd)} THE TEST PROGRAM CRASHES so I think I have
> more copies of the result of this query than I need.
This is just going to create a multi-dimensional array - with each
element being
>> See http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/savepoints.html
>>
>> The situation might not come up but it can't hurt to have it already
>> built in "just in case".
>
> This doesn't appear deal with *nested transactions.* It appears that it
> will use a single transaction and you can just save up
Hi,
Something in my program is eating up memory. I am running php 5 and
hooking into postgres8.3, but I don't think it is a database program.
The command in question works fine in psql, the problem comes in
loading a php variable. And in the past, unsetting the variable has helped.
The p
Bob,
Post your failing code and we'l be glad to give you pointers on fixing it.
This list doesn't exist to write code for you (unless your dropping coin into
our paypal account) but all of us are willing to help with posted code.
Wolf
-Original Message-
From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Weston C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a setup like you've got with a SimpleXML object, where object
> properties aren't necessarily declared in the class definition but are
> added on an ad hoc basis, is there any performance hit?
>
> If not, other than the abil
Am 2008-05-23 14:02:50, schrieb Andrew Ballard:
> If you have a cell phone, privacy went out the window a while ago anyway.
>
> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-6140191.html
I know, since I was last year victim of an "accident" in the suveillance
because have registered/stored all calls since I
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Chris W wrote:
> Bob wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have a database table I have created for navigation.
> >
> > The table fields are uid, parent_id, menu_name.
> >
> > Each entry is either a top level element with a parent_id of 0 or a child
> > which has a parent_id that relate
In a setup like you've got with a SimpleXML object, where object
properties aren't necessarily declared in the class definition but are
added on an ad hoc basis, is there any performance hit?
If not, other than the ability to mark properties as private, is there
any other particular advantage to d
16 matches
Mail list logo
