On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Matt Neimeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to tell if a function has been called that has resulted
>>> in a call to the same function?
>>>
>>> We have
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Thijs Lensselink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Angelo Zanetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Guys,
>>
>> We have a project where by we have a map in ai format (vector format).
>> What
>> we want to do is to programmatically come up with a solution that say on
2008/5/8 Matt Neimeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there a way to tell if a function has been called that has resulted
> in a call to the same function?
debug_backtrace()
Can't comment on performance, though. Its an inelegant solution.
> We have an in-house CRM app that has a function that draws
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Matt Neimeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to tell if a function has been called that has resulted
in a call to the same function?
We have an in-house CRM app that has a function that draws a tabbed
panel on a screen... BUT if th
Sanjeev N wrote:
> Hi Jim Lucas,
>
> You are correct... i want to run in the same way.
>
> but as my 2 tables, column name are different i cant run the LOAD DATA
> infile.
If you're inserting the same data, then use LOAD DATA INFILE to load it
into a temporary table, then use INSERT SELECT's to
Richard Heyes wrote:
I do not agree that creating a database which is normalised to3NF is a
waste of time.
It isn't always, but it is sometimes. When time is a (significant)
factor, getting something up and running (which has acceptable
performance) may be more impotant than creating a techni
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Richard Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dan Joseph wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Richard Kurth <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dan Joseph wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Richard Kurth <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Matt Neimeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to tell if a function has been called that has resulted
> in a call to the same function?
>
> We have an in-house CRM app that has a function that draws a tabbed
> panel on a screen... BUT if there are sub-su
Is there a way to tell if a function has been called that has resulted
in a call to the same function?
We have an in-house CRM app that has a function that draws a tabbed
panel on a screen... BUT if there are sub-sub-tabbed panels we want to
invert the tab colors and panel colors...
So...
DrawSu
Dan Joseph wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Richard Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dan Joseph wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Richard Kurth <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have a program that I am writing that I what to install on my server
that
can be access
revDAVE wrote:
Newbie - is there a function similar to the sql 'like' comparison operator?
I would like to be able to compare 2 strings:
If $this ---*like or similar to*--- $that
That type of thing...
I know of this page:
http://us3.php.net/manual/sl/language.operators.comparison.php
But
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Richard Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dan Joseph wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Richard Kurth <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I have a program that I am writing that I what to install on my server
>>> that
>>> can be accessed by al
If you mean then this should be okay:
$tag_regex=array(
'/\(.*?)\<\/p\> /si' => "$1",
'/\(.*?)\<\/p\>/si' => "$2"
);
$paragraphs=preg_replace(array_keys($tag_regex),array_values($tag_regex),$pa
ge);
$paragraphs will be the return value
$page is the text with all of the tags that you want to
Dan Joseph wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Richard Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have a program that I am writing that I what to install on my server that
can be accessed by all domains on the server just like it was on there
domain. Could somebody give me an idea on how I can d
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Richard Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have a program that I am writing that I what to install on my server that
> can be accessed by all domains on the server just like it was on there
> domain. Could somebody give me an idea on how I can do this or point me
I have a program that I am writing that I what to install on my server
that can be accessed by all domains on the server just like it was on
there domain. Could somebody give me an idea on how I can do this or
point me to some article that tells how to set this up.
--
PHP General Mailing List
Hi RevDave
Theres the similar_text() function which calculates the procentage of te
similarity between
two strings.
If your looking for a check to see if a string has some specified text then
use the strpos()
function and then the identical comparison operator to check for true and
false
Newbie - is there a function similar to the sql 'like' comparison operator?
I would like to be able to compare 2 strings:
If $this ---*like or similar to*--- $that
That type of thing...
I know of this page:
http://us3.php.net/manual/sl/language.operators.comparison.php
But I don't see somet
Lo again,
found my mistake.. in fact, it was the hex-to-rgb conversion not working
properly in some cases.
[SUBJECT CLOSED]
zyro wrote:
>
> Hello together,
>
> I stumbled onto a curious problem:
> i am generating a jpeg/gif with the imagejpeg/imagegif functions (type
> does not alter the res
Hi Jim Lucas,
You are correct... i want to run in the same way.
but as my 2 tables, column name are different i cant run the LOAD DATA
infile.
And the example you mentioned for break at 100, also i thought to use in
that way. but one of the column had the text type which we cant predict
about th
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 14:29 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:03 -0400, tedd wrote:
>> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
