Hi James,
Could share the related test setup details?
Would like to look into this.
Thanks,
Chetan
On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 09:27, James Pang wrote:
> Hi,
>PGv 15.10, many session coming in doing "insert into tablexxx
> values" in parallel, this is a range partiti
'd need to move that to the Path
>> generation phase so that we didn't accidentally reject Paths which
>> could be cheaper than we first think.
>>
>> > Also, how could I contribute to get this partition pruning to work?
>>
>> The pgsql-hackers mailing list is where all the discussions about that
>> happen. There is plenty of past discussions on these topics. One such
>> (fairly) recent discussion is in [1]. There are plenty more, including
>> some ideas from Robert Haas about how we might cost run-time partition
>> pruning. That was likely around 2017-2018 range, so you might need to
>> dig deep to find that.
>>
>> David
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAApHDvoC7n_oceb%3D8z%2BMY8sTgH4xa%2ByAwBxZ4Dxv8pwkT9bOcA%40mail.gmail.com#45314d3d01ef8ad1eebe72111989062c
>>
>
>
> --
> *Lauro Ojeda*
>
--
--
Regards,
Chetan