Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-08-02 Thread Imre Samu
> Application as a whole is expected to give an throughput of 100k transactions per sec. > On this env(8core cpu, 16GB) what is the TPS that we can expect? as a reference - maybe you can reuse/adapt the "TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks" tests - and compare your PG9.6+hardware results. The new T

Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-08-01 Thread Shital A
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, 23:58 Rick Otten, wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:15 PM Andres Freund wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 2019-08-01 23:36:33 +0530, Purav Chovatia wrote: >> > > If you've set synchronous_commit = off, and you still get only 1200 >> > > transactions/sec, something else is off. Are

Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-08-01 Thread Rick Otten
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:15 PM Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2019-08-01 23:36:33 +0530, Purav Chovatia wrote: > > > If you've set synchronous_commit = off, and you still get only 1200 > > > transactions/sec, something else is off. Are you sure you set that? > > I am not very surprised with th

Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-08-01 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2019-08-01 23:36:33 +0530, Purav Chovatia wrote: > > If you've set synchronous_commit = off, and you still get only 1200 > > transactions/sec, something else is off. Are you sure you set that? > I am not very surprised with these results. However, what’s the disk type? > That can matter qui

Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-08-01 Thread Purav Chovatia
I am not very surprised with these results. However, what’s the disk type? That can matter quite a bit. On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 10:51 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2019-08-01 08:40:53 +0530, Shital A wrote: > > Need help in: > > 1. On this env(8core cpu, 16GB) what is the TPS that we can e

Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-08-01 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2019-08-01 08:40:53 +0530, Shital A wrote: > Need help in: > 1. On this env(8core cpu, 16GB) what is the TPS that we can expect? We have > tested with a simple Java code firing insert and commit in a loop on a > simple table with one column. We get 1200 rows per sec. If we increase > thread

Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-07-31 Thread Shital A
Hello, Version 9.6 is used because the components interacting with DB support this version. OS is RHEL 7.6. Thanks! On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, 10:45 Gavin Flower, wrote: > On 01/08/2019 15:10, Shital A wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We are working on development of an application with postgresql 9.6 as >

Re: PSQL performance - TPS

2019-07-31 Thread Gavin Flower
On 01/08/2019 15:10, Shital A wrote: Hello, We are working on development of an application with postgresql 9.6 as backend. Application as a whole is expected to give an throughput of 100k transactions per sec. The transactions are received by DB from component firing DMLs in ad-hoc fashion i

PSQL performance - TPS

2019-07-31 Thread Shital A
Hello, We are working on development of an application with postgresql 9.6 as backend. Application as a whole is expected to give an throughput of 100k transactions per sec. The transactions are received by DB from component firing DMLs in ad-hoc fashion i.e. the commits are fired after random num