> The history is long, but if you want to read.
>
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7ff352d4-4879-5181-eb89-8a2046f928e6%40dunslane.net
Thank you, Ranier.
It's amazing how much effort and work that issue caused! Thank You and all
involved!
Regards,
Julius Tuskenis
2021-10-08, pn, 15:50
Em sex., 8 de out. de 2021 às 09:06, Julius Tuskenis <
[email protected]> escreveu:
> Thank you, Ranier,
>
> v12.8 has improved the performance
>
> PostgreSQL 12.8, compiled by Visual C++ build 1914, 64-bit:
> ```
> Function Scan on pg_show_all_settings a (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=5
> width
Thank you, Ranier,
v12.8 has improved the performance
PostgreSQL 12.8, compiled by Visual C++ build 1914, 64-bit:
```
Function Scan on pg_show_all_settings a (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=5
width=485) (actual time=7.122..7.128 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (name = 'standard_conforming_strings'::text)
Ro
Em sex., 8 de out. de 2021 às 04:01, Julius Tuskenis <
[email protected]> escreveu:
> Dear PostgreSQL community,
>
> we have noticed a severe decrease in performance reading
> pg_catalog.pg_settings table in PostgreSQL 12 on MS Windows 10 machines
> compared to earlier versions.
>
> ```
>
Dear PostgreSQL community,
we have noticed a severe decrease in performance reading
pg_catalog.pg_settings table in PostgreSQL 12 on MS Windows 10 machines
compared to earlier versions.
```
explain (analyze, buffers, timing)
SELECT * from pg_catalog.pg_settings where name =
'standard_conforming_s