Help. The database was created using collation version 2.17, but the operating system provides version 2.34.

2024-06-20 Thread Dmitry O Litvintsev
Hello, I am in the process of migrating DB to Alma9 host. The databse is rather large - few TBs. I have run pg_basebackup on Alma9 host and established replication from production to it. The idea is to quickly switch from master to this new host during downtime. Establishing replication we

Re: Help. The database was created using collation version 2.17, but the operating system provides version 2.34.

2024-06-20 Thread Achilleas Mantzios - cloud
hi On 6/20/24 10:23, Dmitry O Litvintsev wrote: Hello, I am in the process of migrating DB to Alma9 host. The databse is rather large - few TBs. I have run pg_basebackup on Alma9 host and established replication from production to it. The idea is to quickly switch from master to this new host

Postgresql python in upgraded version 16.2

2024-06-20 Thread Šika Michal
TLP:AMBER Hello all, I upgraded version of Postgres from 13.5 to newest 16.2. But Python was not upgraded. I create procedure pyver(): CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pyver () RETURNS TEXT AS $$ import sys pyversion = sys.version return pyversion $$ LANGUAGE 'plpython3u'; On the Po

Re: Help. The database was created using collation version 2.17, but the operating system provides version 2.34.

2024-06-20 Thread Kenneth Barber
> I am in the process of migrating DB to Alma9 host. The databse > is rather large - few TBs. > > I have run pg_basebackup on Alma9 host and established replication from > production to it. The idea is to quickly switch from master to this new host > during downtime. > > Establishing replication

Re: Help. The database was created using collation version 2.17, but the operating system provides version 2.34.

2024-06-20 Thread Daniel Verite
Dmitry O Litvintsev wrote: > WARNING: database "xxx" has a collation version mismatch > DETAIL: The database was created using collation version 2.17, but the > operating system provides version 2.34. > HINT: Rebuild all objects in this database that use the default collation > and run

Re: Help. The database was created using collation version 2.17, but the operating system provides version 2.34.

2024-06-20 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 3:23 AM Dmitry O Litvintsev wrote: > Hello, > > I am in the process of migrating DB to Alma9 host. The databse > is rather large - few TBs. > > I have run pg_basebackup on Alma9 host and established replication from > production to it. The idea is to quickly switch from ma

Re: Transaction issue

2024-06-20 Thread Karsten Hilbert
Am Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:32:07PM -0700 schrieb Rich Shepard: > Yes, I see how this works if the transaction is committed. But before I > commit the transaction I run a select statement to ensure the rows added are > correct. Can I rollback a commited transaction? I've assumed not, so I won't > c

Re: Transaction issue

2024-06-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Karsten Hilbert wrote: Shot in the dark: are you be any chance using tab-completion when running the SELECT before the COMMIT ? Karsten, Nope. I prepare DDL, DML, and DQL scripts in emacs, then run them from the psql prompt using \i . Regards, Rich

Re: Transaction issue

2024-06-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024, Ron Johnson wrote: In addition, manually run the "BEGIN;" before the "\i insert-blarge.sql" command. That way, insert-blarge.sql just inserts. My reasoning: since you control the ROLLBACK, you should also control the BEGIN. Ron, Hadn't thought of doing that, but now will

Re: Transaction issue

2024-06-20 Thread Rob Sargent
> On Jun 20, 2024, at 7:05 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > >> Shot in the dark: are you be any chance using tab-completion >> when running the SELECT before the COMMIT ? > > Karsten, > > Nope. I prepare DDL, DML, and DQL scripts in emacs, then run

Re: Transaction issue

2024-06-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Rob Sargent wrote: Is psql running in emacs (which is my preferred sql shell. M-x sql-postgres)? Rob, Not when I'm entering new data or updating existing tables. Otherwise, yes. Regards, Rich

Re: Transaction issue

2024-06-20 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 6/20/24 07:47, Rich Shepard wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Rob Sargent wrote: Is psql running in emacs (which is my preferred sql shell. M-x sql-postgres)? Rob, Not when I'm entering new data or updating existing tables. Otherwise, yes. From one of my previous posts(modified): At this poi

Re: Postgresql python in upgraded version 16.2

2024-06-20 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 6/19/24 22:05, Šika Michal wrote: TLP:AMBER Hello all, I upgraded version of Postgres from 13.5 to newest 16.2. But Python was not upgraded. I create procedure pyver(): CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pyver ()  RETURNS TEXT  AS $$      import sys      pyversion = sys.version      return p

Re: Transaction issue

2024-06-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Adrian Klaver wrote: From one of my previous posts(modified): At this point I think you need to create a simple test case where: 1) You have script with BEGIN; COMMIT; --optional 2) In psql do \i 3) Do what you did before to 'recover' from the error. Shows us the conte

Autovacuum, dead tuples and bloat

2024-06-20 Thread Shenavai, Manuel
Hi everyone, we can see in our database, that the DB is 200GB of size, with 99% bloat. After vacuum full the DB decreases to 2GB. DB total size: 200GB DB bloat: 198 GB DB non-bloat: 2GB We further see, that during bulk updates (i.e. a long running transaction), the DB is still growing, i.e. the

Re: Autovacuum, dead tuples and bloat

2024-06-20 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 6/20/24 09:46, Shenavai, Manuel wrote: Hi everyone, we can see in our database, that the DB is 200GB of size, with 99% bloat. After vacuum full the DB decreases to 2GB. DB total size: 200GB DB bloat: 198 GB > DB non-bloat: 2GB We further see, that during bulk updates (i.e. a long running

Re: Autovacuum, dead tuples and bloat

2024-06-20 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:47 PM Shenavai, Manuel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > we can see in our database, that the DB is 200GB of size, with 99% bloat. > After vacuum full the DB decreases to 2GB. > > DB total size: 200GB > > DB bloat: 198 GB > > DB non-bloat: 2GB > > > > We further see, that d

Re: Autovacuum, dead tuples and bloat

2024-06-20 Thread Achilleas Mantzios
Στις 20/6/24 19:46, ο/η Shenavai, Manuel έγραψε: Hi everyone, we can see in our database, that the DB is 200GB of size, with 99% bloat. After vacuum full the DB decreases to 2GB. DB total size: 200GB DB bloat: 198 GB DB non-bloat: 2GB We further see, that during bulk updates (i.e. a long