On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 16:23 +0530, Postgres all-rounder wrote:
> Could you please point me to the link where the "two-phase commit" approach
> is being discussed.
> I can track it for my reference.
I looked, and didn't find it. I must have mis-remembered.
There is this proposal:
https://www.pos
Hi Laurenz,
Thank you for the quick response.
Could you please point me to the link where the "two-phase commit" approach
is being discussed.
I can track it for my reference.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 3:26 PM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 15:05 +0530, Postgres all-rounder wrote:
>
On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 15:05 +0530, Postgres all-rounder wrote:
> Context: We have faced a network isolation and ended-up with locally
> committed data on the
> old primary database server as one of the tools that is in-place for HA
> decided to promote
> one of the SYNC standby servers. As the P
Hi Team,
*Context: *We have faced a network isolation and ended-up with locally
committed data on the
old primary database server as one of the tools that is in-place for HA
decided to promote one of the SYNC standby servers. As the PostgreSQL won't
provide a HA solution as in-built, I would like
