Re: n_live_tup count increase after vacuum
Jason Ralph writes: > I recently upgraded a neglected DB in our fleet that contains a huge table > (1.4B) rows. I ran a vacuum against the huge table, as expected it took a > long time, but it did finish. > I think I understand most of what the output is saying... one confusing > thing > T
n_live_tup count increase after vacuum
Hello Lists, DB1=# select version(); -[ RECORD 1 ] version | PostgreSQL 11.5 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23), 64-bit I recently upgraded a neglected