Re: Sv: WAL-dir filling up with wal_level = logical

On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 12:40:16PM +0200, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: > On 3 August 2018 12:33:26 CEST, Andreas Joseph Krogh > wrote: >>Hm, a co-worker noticed that we have max_wal_size = 16GB, that might be >>the >>reason:-) > > Yes ;-) Worth mentioning that this is a soft size, and not a hard

Re: Sv: WAL-dir filling up with wal_level = logical

On 3 August 2018 12:33:26 CEST, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: >På fredag 03. august 2018 kl. 12:12:33, skrev Andreas Joseph Krogh < >andr...@visena.com >: >Version: PG-10.4 >  >I don't (yet) have any replication-slots configured, and hence no >standbys are >subscribed, bu

Re: WAL-dir filling up with wal_level = logical

On 3 August 2018 12:12:33 CEST, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: >Version: PG-10.4 >  >I don't (yet) have any replication-slots configured, and hence no >standbys are >subscribed, but I have wal_level = logical configured to be able to add > >subscribers later. I'm seeing that WAL-dir is filling up wi

Sv: WAL-dir filling up with wal_level = logical

På fredag 03. august 2018 kl. 12:12:33, skrev Andreas Joseph Krogh < andr...@visena.com >: Version: PG-10.4   I don't (yet) have any replication-slots configured, and hence no standbys are subscribed, but I have wal_level = logical configured to be able to add subscribe

WAL-dir filling up with wal_level = logical

Version: PG-10.4   I don't (yet) have any replication-slots configured, and hence no standbys are subscribed, but I have wal_level = logical configured to be able to add subscribers later. I'm seeing that WAL-dir is filling up with WAL-files (now 17GB and not declining), is this expected behavio