Hi, Tom,
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 5:27 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Igor Korot writes:
> > Imagine you are a developer/maintainer of sme software. This software needs
> > to
> > connect to different DBMSes perform soe operations and then disconnect.
> > It is very easy to say that I have SQLite as a su
Igor Korot writes:
> Imagine you are a developer/maintainer of sme software. This software needs to
> connect to different DBMSes perform soe operations and then disconnect.
> It is very easy to say that I have SQLite as a submodule in my Git tree,
> I have mysql-connector as a submodule, but I ca
Hi, Adrian,
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:28 PM Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
> On 10/3/21 1:20 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:11 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >>
> >> Igor Korot writes:
> >>> I wonder who ade the decision not to provide an independent build
> >>> of the client l
Igor Korot writes:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:11 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Having said that, it does work on non-Windows machines to do
>> ./configure ...
>> cd src/interfaces/libpq
>> make -s install
> Well, asking people to download the whole source tree just to build
> client library 1000 times a
On 10/3/21 1:20 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:11 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Igor Korot writes:
I wonder who ade the decision not to provide an independent build
of the client library of PostgreSQL? And what was the reason behind it?
But building the whole tree is just th
Hi Tom,
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:11 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Igor Korot writes:
> > I wonder who ade the decision not to provide an independent build
> > of the client library of PostgreSQL? And what was the reason behind it?
>
> It wasn't worth the maintenance trouble. It still isn't. On any
>
Igor Korot writes:
> I wonder who ade the decision not to provide an independent build
> of the client library of PostgreSQL? And what was the reason behind it?
It wasn't worth the maintenance trouble. It still isn't. On any
remotely-modern machine, a build of the whole tree is only going
to ta
Hi, ALL,
I wonder who ade the decision not to provide an independent build
of the client library of PostgreSQL? And what was the reason behind it?
Its very annoying to build the whole server, just to create a client library
to connect to a remote DB. And then kill the build after the install as
us
