Christopher Sumner writes:
> I'm using PostgreSQL v. 10.14 via AWS Aurora Serverless. Our users
> recently noticed gaps in the primary ids for many of our tables. As I
> understand it, this is due to PostgreSQL effectively caching 32 additional
> sequence values (hardcoded in sequence.c ) and a
On 5/11/21 9:54 AM, Christopher Sumner wrote:
Hello.
I'm using PostgreSQL v. 10.14 via AWS Aurora Serverless. Our users
recently noticed gaps in the primary ids for many of our tables. As I
understand it, this is due to PostgreSQL effectively caching 32
additional sequence values (hardcoded
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 5:55 PM Christopher Sumner
wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm using PostgreSQL v. 10.14 via AWS Aurora Serverless. Our users recently
> noticed gaps in the primary ids for many of our tables. As I understand it,
> this is due to PostgreSQL effectively caching 32 additional seque
Hello.
I'm using PostgreSQL v. 10.14 via AWS Aurora Serverless. Our users
recently noticed gaps in the primary ids for many of our tables. As I
understand it, this is due to PostgreSQL effectively caching 32 additional
sequence values (hardcoded in sequence.c ) and a 'restart' occurs. Losing
a