Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber

2020-01-19 Thread Arnaud L.
Le 17/01/2020 à 19:07, Laurenz Albe a écrit : On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:43 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote: > > is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the > > logical replication ? > > Yes, if you don't want physical backups. You mean online physical backups ? I could still shut

Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber

2020-01-17 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:43 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote: > > > is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the > > > logical replication ? > > > > Yes, if you don't want physical backups. > > You mean online physical backups ? > I could still shutdown the subscriber and take an off

Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber

2020-01-16 Thread Arnaud L.
Le 16/01/2020 à 19:58, Laurenz Albe a écrit : On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote: is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the logical replication ? Yes, if you don't want physical backups. You mean online physical backups ? I could still shutdown the su

Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber

2020-01-16 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote: > is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the > logical replication ? Yes, if you don't want physical backups. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com