On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:58 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Joseph Koshakow writes:
> > Is this an intentional decision to not support a binary encoding for
> > aclitem types? Or is it just a lack of a feature?
>
I'm also using binary input/output, and for ACLs, when not using the usual
ACL related funct
Joseph Koshakow writes:
> Is this an intentional decision to not support a binary encoding for
> aclitem types? Or is it just a lack of a feature?
I think it's at least somewhat intentional, to have a core type
that has no binary I/O so that that case can be tested. In any
event, a binary repres
