*PGDG
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 at 08:38, Jim Vanns wrote:
> Official PGDB RPM build for Centos 7.9
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 23:31, Adrian Klaver
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/1/24 15:13, Jim Vanns wrote:
>> > PG 15.4
>>
>> Community edition or some variant?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrian Klaver
>> adrian.kla...@a
Official PGDB RPM build for Centos 7.9
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 23:31, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 8/1/24 15:13, Jim Vanns wrote:
> > PG 15.4
>
> Community edition or some variant?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>
>
--
Jim Vanns
Principal Production Engineer
Industrial Lig
On 8/1/24 15:13, Jim Vanns wrote:
PG 15.4
Community edition or some variant?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
PG 15.4
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 22:27, Ron Johnson wrote:
> PG 15.0 or 15.7?
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:58 PM Jim Vanns wrote:
>
>> Sorry, PG15.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:25, Adrian Klaver
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/1/24 12:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> > Jim Vanns writes:
>>> >> I have t
PG 15.0 or 15.7?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:58 PM Jim Vanns wrote:
> Sorry, PG15.
>
> Jim
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:25, Adrian Klaver
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/1/24 12:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Jim Vanns writes:
>> >> I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name -
>> >> 'foob
I don't at hand, but the query I used to identify this was;
SELECT state, pid, pg_blocking_pids(pid), query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE backend_type='client backend';
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Vanns writes:
> > I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of th
Sorry, PG15.
Jim
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:25, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 8/1/24 12:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Jim Vanns writes:
> >> I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name -
> >> 'foobar'. Why would a vacuum of 'foobar' from one session block the
> vacuum
> >> of 'fo
On 8/1/24 12:12, Tom Lane wrote:
Jim Vanns writes:
I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name -
'foobar'. Why would a vacuum of 'foobar' from one session block the vacuum
of 'foobar' in the other session?
That's fairly hard to believe. Can you provide a self-contai
Jim Vanns writes:
> I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name -
> 'foobar'. Why would a vacuum of 'foobar' from one session block the vacuum
> of 'foobar' in the other session?
That's fairly hard to believe. Can you provide a self-contained test
case?
