Laurenz Albe writes:
> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm a little bemused by your fixation on this particular CVE,
>> though. As such things go, it's not a very big deal.
> A lot of times, requests like that come from a brainless kind of
> institutionalized security: we h
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?bWlzaGExOTY2IG1pc2hhMTk2Ng==?= writes:
> > Is there a patch for 9.6 ?
>
> No; that's out of support too.
>
> I'm a little bemused by your fixation on this particular CVE,
> though. As such things go, it's not a very big deal. It's
=?UTF-8?B?bWlzaGExOTY2IG1pc2hhMTk2Ng==?= writes:
> Is there a patch for 9.6 ?
No; that's out of support too.
You might find that adapting the v10 patch back to 9.6, and
thence to 9.5, would be easier than trying to do it in one step.
I'm a little bemused by your fixation on this particular CVE,
Le jeu. 15 sept. 2022 à 16:52, misha1966 misha1966 a
écrit :
> Is there a patch for 9.6 ?
>
A quick Google search for "postgres CVE-2022-2625" gives you
https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2022-2625/. And this page
tells you there's only a fix for releases 10 to 14. Moreover, fixes i
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 07:24 +0300, misha1966 misha1966 wrote:
> > Четверг, 15 сентября 2022, 1:58 +09:00 от Laurenz Albe
> > :
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 17:02 +0300, misha1966 misha1966 wrote:
> > > Tell me, is there a CVE-2022-2625 vulnerability in posgresql 9.5?
> > > If so, who knows how
