Re: PLPGSQL - store fetched records in array of record

2025-07-02 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 7/2/25 07:26, Durumdara wrote: Sorry. I forgot to mention that I have two arrays (records). One for the modifiable elements, and one for the checkable elements. If there is a conflict between the actual mod. item and one of the checkable items, the checkable item will move to the end of the

Re: PLPGSQL - store fetched records in array of record

2025-07-02 Thread Durumdara
Sorry. I forgot to mention that I have two arrays (records). One for the modifiable elements, and one for the checkable elements. If there is a conflict between the actual mod. item and one of the checkable items, the checkable item will move to the end of the modification list. And the actual mo

Re: PLPGSQL - store fetched records in array of record

2025-07-02 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 8:21 AM Durumdara wrote: > Hello! > > I have to store some fetched records into two lists (arrays) to work with > them. > There's almost certainly a way to do what you need done without using arrays. Might require a bit of rethinking, though. -- Death to , and butter sa

Re: PLPGSQL - store fetched records in array of record

2025-07-02 Thread David G. Johnston
On Wednesday, July 2, 2025, Durumdara wrote: > > > Is there any way to avoid this? To use a "simple untyped record" in an > array without "dependencies"? > Use jsonb David J.