> "ignore" may not be what you want, though. Perhaps the fact that insert
> (coming from the NOT MATCHED clause) fails (== conflicts with a tuple
> concurrently inserted in an unique or exclusion constraint) should
> transform the row operation into a MATCHED case, so it'd fire the other
> clauses
On 2023-Nov-16, Nick DeCoursin wrote:
> In my opinion, it would be better for merge to offer the functionality to
> simply ignore the rows that cause unique violation exceptions instead of
> tanking the whole query.
"ignore" may not be what you want, though. Perhaps the fact that insert
(coming
