On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 17:28:06 -0400
Michael Schanne wrote:
> After a closer reading of the documentation, it appears the database should
> stop accepting new transactions before a wraparound would ever occur. If
> so, then the only possible explanations for this multixactid wraparound
> error woul
After a closer reading of the documentation, it appears the database should
stop accepting new transactions before a wraparound would ever occur. If
so, then the only possible explanations for this multixactid wraparound
error would be data corruption, or a bug in postgresql. The exact version
I'
I don't believe you can determine a date/time that it happened, but
querying the age of the table is simple to do and then you can compare that
with the freeze age parameters. A periodic manual vacuum freeze may
preclude the system ever needing to perform the emergency autovacuum
freeze, and as an
