On Tuesday, July 2, 2024, Stuart Campbell
wrote:
> This is a question for AWS. Community PostgreSQL doesn't have any of
>> these concepts, and this is all proprietary modifications to PostgreSQL by
>> Amazon.
>
>
> Maybe my question can be re-summarised as: do DDL operations on temporary
> table
> On Jul 2, 2024, at 18:16, Stuart Campbell
> wrote:
>
> My understanding was that under the hood, AWS uses the logical replication
> features that are present in community Postgres. If that's incorrect then I'm
> sorry for the off-topic post.
Yes, but: The idea of a "degraded" replication
>
> This is a question for AWS. Community PostgreSQL doesn't have any of
> these concepts, and this is all proprietary modifications to PostgreSQL by
> Amazon.
My understanding was that under the hood, AWS uses the logical replication
features that are present in community Postgres. If that's in
> On Jul 2, 2024, at 17:47, Stuart Campbell
> wrote:
> My question is whether there is some workaround that will let me create
> indexes on a temporary table, and also let me drop the temporary table, in a
> way that doesn't end up "degrading" replication? (Presumably that means
> avoiding
