On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:28:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> raf writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 06:43:22PM -0700, "David G. Johnston"
> > wrote:
> >> You specified “-1” so I don’t get why you believe pg_restore should be
> >> continuing to execute in the face of the SQL error.
>
> > The r
raf writes:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 06:43:22PM -0700, "David G. Johnston"
> wrote:
>> You specified “-1” so I don’t get why you believe pg_restore should be
>> continuing to execute in the face of the SQL error.
> The reason I believe pg_restore should be continuing to execute in the face of
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 06:43:22PM -0700, "David G. Johnston"
wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 3, 2024, raf wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need help!
> >
> > I'm upgrading an ancient (but still awesome) postgresql-9.6.24 (via
> > EnterpriseDB)
> > to (a no doubt even more awesome) postgresql-15.8 (v
On Tuesday, September 3, 2024, raf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need help!
>
> I'm upgrading an ancient (but still awesome) postgresql-9.6.24 (via
> EnterpriseDB)
> to (a no doubt even more awesome) postgresql-15.8 (via debian (stable)
> packages)
> but am unable to load database backups that were encrypte
