On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 3:01 PM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 7/11/25 13:30, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:17 AM Dominique Devienne
> > Aside: This may be an unpopular position, but I think the postgres
> > extension system is useless for 3rd party contributions until there is
On 7/11/25 13:30, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:17 AM Dominique Devienne
Aside: This may be an unpopular position, but I think the postgres
extension system is useless for 3rd party contributions until there is
some way to introduce items in the vein of npm, pip, etc.
Ha
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:17 AM Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 6:05 PM Florents Tselai
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025, 18:27 Adrian Klaver
> wrote:
> >> [...] create an extension that incorporates the code.
> >
> > That's an ideal use case for an extension indeed .
>
>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 6:05 PM Florents Tselai
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025, 18:27 Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> [...] create an extension that incorporates the code.
>
> That's an ideal use case for an extension indeed .
Extensions are of no use to me, unfortunately, unless built-in and
official. S
On 7/11/25 09:03, Florents Tselai wrote:
That's an ideal use case for an extension indeed .
@Dominique I'd suggest searching for these function on GitHub, just in
case there are already implementations out there.
I've seen a lot of weird aggregates out there for niche cases.
If not, it migh
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025, 18:27 Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 7/11/25 01:49, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 6:25 PM Adrian Klaver
> wrote:
> >> On 7/10/25 04:48, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> >>> Seems so logical to me, that these hashing functions were available
> >>> are aggregate
On 7/11/25 01:49, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 6:25 PM Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 7/10/25 04:48, Dominique Devienne wrote:
Seems so logical to me, that these hashing functions were available
are aggregates, I can't be the first one to think of that, can it?
I've been on thi
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:00 AM Dominique Devienne wrote:
> The current md5() and pgcrypto.digest() functions roll the x1
> init, xN process, and x1 finish into a single call, processing a
> single bytea (or perhaps more intelligently for TOAST'ed values, the
> 2K "rows" of those in streaming-fas
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 5:01 AM Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 7:11 PM Ron Johnson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:26 PM Adrian Klaver <
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
> >> On 7/10/25 04:48, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> >> > Seems so logical to me, that these has
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 9:03 PM Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 5:48 AM Dominique Devienne
> wrote:
>> We store scientific information in PostgreSQL, and some of that is
>> bytea and large, thus we must "chunk it" both for performance, and not
>> be limited to 1GB (we do exceed t
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 7:11 PM Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:26 PM Adrian Klaver
> wrote:
>> On 7/10/25 04:48, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>> > Seems so logical to me, that these hashing functions were available
>> > are aggregates, I can't be the first one to think of that, can
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 6:25 PM Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 7/10/25 04:48, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > Seems so logical to me, that these hashing functions were available
> > are aggregates, I can't be the first one to think of that, can it?
>
> I've been on this list since late 2002 and I don't r
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 5:48 AM Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> We store scientific information in PostgreSQL, and some of that is
> bytea and large, thus we must "chunk it" both for performance, and not
> be limited to 1GB (we do exceed that, in rare occasions).
>
> Recently I added md5/sha1 hashi
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:26 PM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 7/10/25 04:48, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
> > Seems so logical to me, that these hashing functions were available
> > are aggregates, I can't be the first one to think of that, can it?
> >
>
> I've been on this list since late 2002 and I
On 7/10/25 04:48, Dominique Devienne wrote:
Seems so logical to me, that these hashing functions were available
are aggregates, I can't be the first one to think of that, can it?
I've been on this list since late 2002 and I don't recall this ever
being brought up. Now it is entirely possible
15 matches
Mail list logo
