>
> I apologize for top posting, Google hid all of the other stuff.
>
It is only me who thinks that when it comes to destroying email as a
communication tool, no one did a better job than effing gmail.
I apologize for top posting, Google hid all of the other stuff.
George
iGLASS Networks
www.iglass.net
>>
>>
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW tickets AS
SELECT *, tableoid
FROM public.tickets
WHERE ( ticketsid IN (SELECT ticketsid
FROM machtick));
iGLASS Networks
www.iglass.net
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:32 AM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 11/13/18 6:54 AM, George
On 11/13/18 6:54 AM, George Woodring wrote:
The tickets view restricts which tickets can be seen by the schema.
9.3 must have created the view in the same column order as the table
(which is the case looking at one of our 9.3 databases which we have not
updated yet), which is why we never saw
The tickets view restricts which tickets can be seen by the schema.
9.3 must have created the view in the same column order as the table (which
is the case looking at one of our 9.3 databases which we have not updated
yet), which is why we never saw the issue before.
George
iGLASS Networks
www.ig
On 11/13/18 6:27 AM, George Woodring wrote:
I think the issue is that the function is not putting the data into the
tickets%ROWTYPE correctly. When I do \d on public.tickets and
iss-hackers.tickets, the columns are in a different order.
The error message is saying column2 is not a timesta
On 11/13/18 6:27 AM, George Woodring wrote:
I think the issue is that the function is not putting the data into the
tickets%ROWTYPE correctly. When I do \d on public.tickets and
iss-hackers.tickets, the columns are in a different order.
That is because you have a table tickets in the public s
I think the issue is that the function is not putting the data into the
tickets%ROWTYPE correctly. When I do \d on public.tickets and
iss-hackers.tickets, the columns are in a different order.
\d public.tickets
Column| Type |
Modifiers
--+--
On 11/13/18 5:17 AM, George Woodring wrote:
We are having an issue with one of our plpgsql functions after migrating
from 9.3 to 9.6. The function works fine until you change the search path.
psql (9.6.10)
Type "help" for help.
woody=> select ticket_summary(8154);
t
Hi
út 13. 11. 2018 v 14:18 odesílatel George Woodring <
george.woodr...@iglass.net> napsal:
> We are having an issue with one of our plpgsql functions after migrating
> from 9.3 to 9.6. The function works fine until you change the search path.
>
> psql (9.6.10)
> Type "help" for help.
>
> woody=
We are having an issue with one of our plpgsql functions after migrating
from 9.3 to 9.6. The function works fine until you change the search path.
psql (9.6.10)
Type "help" for help.
woody=> select ticket_summary(8154);
ticket_summary
--
11 matches
Mail list logo