"yotsunaga.na...@fujitsu.com" writes:
> I did the following.
> Even though I accessed one partition table(test2 table), I also acquired
> locks on other partition tables(test1 table).
> I expected to acquire locks on the parent table(test table) and the partition
> table to access(test2 table).
Hi all,
I have a question.
I did the following.
Even though I accessed one partition table(test2 table), I also acquired locks
on other partition tables(test1 table).
I expected to acquire locks on the parent table(test table) and the partition
table to access(test2 table).
Why does this happen
