On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
> The whole point of "#!" working in shell is that the two-bytes
> (a) mark the file as executable by a specific shell command and
> (b) are a shell comment.
Shebang is an unix-ism. It is not part of the shell. The shell just
execs whatever y
The whole point of "#!" working in shell is that the two-bytes
(a) mark the file as executable by a specific shell command and
(b) are a shell comment.
One fairly simple fix that would make annotating here scripts
and the like simpler for shell(ish) execution would be simply
ignoring all text fr
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 08:36 -0500, John McKown wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
> > These languages has defined # as line comment. It is not true for
> > SQL.
>
> Thanks, that looks like a "NO" vote to me.
>
Not necessarily. There are other languages which don'
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Christopher Browne
wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 at 04:00, John McKown
> wrote:
> > To me this looks similar to a UNIX shell script. Now, going sideways for
> a second, if someone wanted to create a "self contained" awk script. It
> would look something like:
>
> >
On Wed, 9 May 2018 at 04:00, John McKown
wrote:
> To me this looks similar to a UNIX shell script. Now, going sideways for
a second, if someone wanted to create a "self contained" awk script. It
would look something like:
> #!/bin/awk -f
> ... awk code ...
I have found it convenient when Lisp im
Stephen Frost writes:
> Greetings,
> * John McKown (john.archie.mck...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Again, this is just a discussion point. And I'm quite willing to admit
>> defeat if most people don't think that it is worth the effort.
> For my 2c, at least, I do think it'd be kind of neat to have, but
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:17 AM, John McKown
wrote:
>
> However, in the second case, the "magic" first line causes psql, at
> present, to report an error and abort. This is why I'd like to modify how
> the file referenced via the -f argument is processed. That is, the first
> line of any file refe
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * John McKown (john.archie.mck...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Again, this is just a discussion point. And I'm quite willing to admit
> > defeat if most people don't think that it is worth the effort.
>
> For my 2c, at least, I do thi
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:56 AM, David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:44 AM, John McKown
> wrote:
>
>> Again, this is just a discussion point. And I'm quite willing to admit
>> defeat if most people don't think that it is worth the effort.
>>
>
> -1, a
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:44 AM, John McKown
wrote:
> Again, this is just a discussion point. And I'm quite willing to admit
> defeat if most people don't think that it is worth the effort.
>
-1, at least per the example. I would not want "-U postgres" inside the
file. I tend to rely on servic
Greetings,
* John McKown (john.archie.mck...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Again, this is just a discussion point. And I'm quite willing to admit
> defeat if most people don't think that it is worth the effort.
For my 2c, at least, I do think it'd be kind of neat to have, but we'd
need a fool-proof way to
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Ron wrote:
> On 05/09/2018 02:59 AM, John McKown wrote:
>
> I just wanted to throw this out to the users before I made a complete fool
> of myself by formally requesting it. But I would like what I hope would be
> a minor change (enhancement) to the psql command. I
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Pavel Stehule
wrote:
>
>
> 2018-05-09 9:59 GMT+02:00 John McKown :
>
>> I just wanted to throw this out to the users before I made a complete
>> fool of myself by formally requesting it. But I would like what I hope
>> would be a minor change (enhancement) to the p
On 05/09/2018 02:59 AM, John McKown wrote:
I just wanted to throw this out to the users before I made a complete fool
of myself by formally requesting it. But I would like what I hope would be
a minor change (enhancement) to the psql command. If you look on this
page, https://wiki.postgresql.or
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Pavel Stehule
wrote:
>
>
> 2018-05-09 9:59 GMT+02:00 John McKown :
>
>> I just wanted to throw this out to the users before I made a complete
>> fool of myself by formally requesting it. But I would like what I hope
>> would be a minor change (enhancement) to the p
2018-05-09 9:59 GMT+02:00 John McKown :
> I just wanted to throw this out to the users before I made a complete fool
> of myself by formally requesting it. But I would like what I hope would be
> a minor change (enhancement) to the psql command. If you look on this page,
> https://wiki.postgresql.
I just wanted to throw this out to the users before I made a complete fool
of myself by formally requesting it. But I would like what I hope would be
a minor change (enhancement) to the psql command. If you look on this page,
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Shared_Database_Hosting ,
you will see a
17 matches
Mail list logo
