On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:09 PM Lev Kokotov wrote:
> Hi Miles,
>
> One issue is keeping the subscriber and the publisher schema identical.
> Running migrations on both the publisher and subscriber does not seem
> atomic to me, therefore I don't have a way to enforce consistency between
> the two.
Another use case is installations where there is heavy reliance on
temporary tables in queries. Since you can't run queries that create
temporary tables on servers that are binary replicas, this leaves the
master (not horizontally scalable) or logical replicas
--cnemelka
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 a
Hi Miles,
One issue is keeping the subscriber and the publisher schema identical.
Running migrations on both the publisher and subscriber does not seem
atomic to me, therefore I don't have a way to enforce consistency between
the two. The use case is simple: schemas change all the time, and keepin
Hi Lev,
While I don't have an answer to your roadmap question, you've raised a
different question for me.
What are you expecting to get from logical replication of DDL commands that
is not served by binary replication? I ask because typically someone would
want to use logical replication if they
Hello,
Is DDL support on a roadmap for logical replication?
Thank you.
- Lev
