> On Aug 6, 2020, at 18:45, Jerry Sievers wrote:
> Deleting the .ready file should allow the archiver to get past the
> missing file.
Ah, excellent, yes.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
x...@thebuild.com
Christophe Pettus writes:
> I've encountered a rather unusual situation (PostgreSQL 9.6). On a
> particular server, for reasons I've not fully diagnosed, the archiver
> thinks that the current WAL segment to be archived is
> 00023B680062. This is unfortunate, because the oldest WAL
I've encountered a rather unusual situation (PostgreSQL 9.6). On a particular
server, for reasons I've not fully diagnosed, the archiver thinks that the
current WAL segment to be archived is 00023B680062. This is
unfortunate, because the oldest WAL segment that actually exists on d
