"Zwettler Markus (OIZ)" writes:
> And I can also do this restore:
>
> Would a pg_restore with a v12 client into a postgres v9.6 database work and
> be officially supported?
>
It might work, but it's not completely guaranteed. Sometimes a new
pg_dump will use DDL syntax that doesn't exist in o
On 7/29/20 6:38 AM, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
I cannot use pg_restore v9.6 on a pg_dump v12 because otherwise: pg_restore:
[archiver] unsupported version (1.14) in file header
The external supplier did PG v9.5 database + pg_dump v12.
I would have to do pg_restore v12 (as of pg_dump v12) into
I cannot use pg_restore v9.6 on a pg_dump v12 because otherwise: pg_restore:
[archiver] unsupported version (1.14) in file header
The external supplier did PG v9.5 database + pg_dump v12.
I would have to do pg_restore v12 (as of pg_dump v12) into my PG v9.6.
The version chain would be PG v9.5 =
And I can also do this restore:
Would a pg_restore with a v12 client into a postgres v9.6 database work and be
officially supported?
-Markus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bruce Momjian
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2020 13:49
> An: Zwettler Markus (OIZ)
> Cc: pgsql-general
